Preferências de Cookie
Preferências de Cookie

Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices

Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices

María De Paz, “Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74, no. 1 (2018): 219–46, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_1_0219

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

137410219

Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices

Type Journal Article
Author María De Paz
Rights © 2018 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2018 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Volume 74
Issue 1
Pages 219-246
Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
ISSN 0870-5283
Date 2018
DOI 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_1_0219
Language English
Abstract The aim of this paper is to reconsider Mach’s position in the light of the recent approach on the interplay of mathematical practices provided by José Ferreirós’ book Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices. In the first section the main approach of the book is presented, with a characterization of the notion of ‘scientific practice’ and the triple approach used to understand mathematical knowledge: cognitive, pragmatist and historical. In the sections 2, 3 and 4 Mach’s philosophical views are presented according to this epistemological approach. The fifth section is the conclusion.
Date Added 26/04/2018, 14:53:53
Modified 26/04/2018, 15:53:45

Tags:

  • history,
  • cognitive approach,
  • philosophy of mathematics,
  • philosophy of science,
  • pragmatism

Notes:

  • Baç, Murat. “Structure versus process: Mach, Hertz, and the normative aspect of science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, no. 1 (2000): 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008334407481
    Banks, Erich. C. “The philosophical roots of Ernst Mach’s economy of thought.” Synthese 139, no. 1 (2004): 23-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000021306. 66850 .a3
    Buchwald, Jed Z. Ed. Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
    Dion, Sonia M. “Pierre Duhem and the inconsistency between instrumentalism and natural classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, no. 1 (2013): 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.001
    Cohen, Robert. S. “Ernst Mach: Physics, Perception and the Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 18 (1968): 132-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1462-4_8
    Collins, Harry M. “‘Son of seven sexes’, The Social Destruction of a Physical Phenomenon”, Social Studies of Science, 11, no. 1 (1981): 33–62, doi: 10.1177/030631278101100103
    de Paz, María. Henri Poincaré: Del Convencionalismo a la Gravitación. London: College Publications, 2016.
    de Paz, María. “Book review of Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices, by José Ferreirós.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 68, no. 271 (2018): 406-408, https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx036 (online first, 2017)
    Gaber, David and Dirk Schlimm, “Basic mathematical cognition”, WIREs Cognitive Science, 6, no. 4 (2015): 355–369, doi: 10.1002/wcs.1351
    Gori, Pietro. “Nietzsche as Phenomenalist?” In Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Hintergründe, Wirkungen und Aktualität edited by Helmut Heit, Günter Abel and Marco Brusotti, 345-356. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
    Gori, Pietro. “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Science? On Ernst Mach’s Pragmatic Epistemology.” In Ernst Mach: Life, Work and Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook) edited by Friedrich Stadler. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018-forthcoming.
    Ferreirós, José. Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
    Hacking, Ian. Representing and Intervening, Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
    Haller, Rudolph. “Conventionalism and its Impact on Logical Empiricism.” Philosophia Scientiae 3, no. 2 (1998-1999): 95-108.
    Hiebert, Erwin N. “Mach’s Philosophical Use of History.” In Historical & Philosophical Perspectives on Science, edited by Roger Stuewer, 184-213. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.
    Johnston, William M. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848-1938. Berkeley: University of Califorina Press, 1983.
    Lenin, Vladimir I. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Translated by Abraham Fineberg. Moscow: Progres Publishers, 1908 [1972].
    Mach, Ernst. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy.Translated by P. E. B. Jourdain. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Co, 1872 [1911].
    Mach, Ernst. Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch Dargestellt. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1883 [1901].
    Mach, Ernst. The Analysis of Sensations. Translated by C. M. Williams. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Co, 1886 [1914].
    Mach, Ernst. Principles of the Theory of Heat. Trnsalted by T. J. McCormack. Dodrecht/Boston: Reidel, 1896 [1986].
    Mach, Ernst. Knowledge and Error. Translated by T. J. McCormack and P. Foulkes. Dordrecth/Boston: Dordrecht-Reidel publishing company, 1905 [1976].
    Marcos, Alfredo. Pierre Duhem. La filosofía de la ciencia en sus orígenes. Barcelona: PPU, 1988.
    Paty, Michel. “Mach et Duhem, l’épistémologie des savants-philosophes.” In Épistémologie et matérialisme edited by Olivier Bloch, 177-218. Paris: Klinsiek, 1986.
    Pickering, Andrew. “Against Correspondence: A Constructivist View of Experiment and the Real”, in Proceedings of PSA 1986, eds. A. Fine and P. Machamer (Pittsburgh: Philosophy of Science Association), vol. 2 (1987): 196–206.
    Pojman, Paul. “Ernst Mach”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/ernst-mach/>.
    Rouse, Joseph. How Scientific Practices Matter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
    Schnädelbach, Herbert. Philosophie in Deutschland 1831-1933, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1983
    Schramm, Alfred. “Metaphysics, Carnap’s Remedy and Machs’s Science.” Philosophia Scientiae 3, no. 2 (1998-1999): 109-120.
    Soler, Léna, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch and Vincent Israel-Jost. Science After the Practice Turn in Philosophy, History, and the Social Studies of Science. New York and London: Routledge, 2014.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa