Brumfiel, Geoff. “Neutrinos not faster than light: ICARUS experiment contradicts controversial claim.” Nature (March 16, 2012). doi: 10.1038/nature.2012.10249.
Curtler, Hugh Mercer. “Can Virtue Be Taught?” Humanitas 7, no. 1 (1994): 43-50.
Duhem, Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Traduzido por Philip. W. Wiener. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954 [1906].
Duhem, Pierre. German Science: Some Reflections on German Science: German Science and German Virtues. Traduzido por John Lyon. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1991 [1915].
Duhem, Pierre. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Traduzido e editado por Roger Ariew e Peter Barker. Indianápolis: Hackett, 1996.
Earman, John. “Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, no. 1 (1993): 19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00255.x
Fairweather, Abrol. “The epistemic value of good sense.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43, no. 1 (2011): 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.11.003.
Fairweather, Abrol. “The epistemic value of good sense.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43, no. 1 (2012): 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.11.003.
Gilles, Donald. “The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis.” In Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993, 98-116.
Ivanova, Milena. “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 41, no. 1 (2010): 58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.009.
Ivanova, Milena. ‘Good Sense’ in Context: A Response to Kidd’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 42, no. 4 (2011): 610-612. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.09.006.
Ivanova, Milena. “Is There a Place for Epistemic Virtues in Theory Choice?” In Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Editado por Abrol Fairweather. Cham: Springer, 2014, 207-226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_13.
Ivanova, Milena; Paternotte, Cedric. “Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus.” Erkenntnis 78, no. 5 (2013): 1109-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10670-012-9390-7.
Kidd, Ian James. “Pierre Duhem’s epistemic aims and the intellectual virtue of humility: A reply to Ivanova.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no. 1 (2011): 185-189. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.007.
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Kuhn, Thomas. “Objectividade, Juízo de Valor e Escolha Teórica.” In A Tensão Essencial. Traduzido por Rui Pacheco. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2009, 363-384.
Kukla, Andre. “Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals?” Erkenntnis 44, no. 2 (1996): 137-66. doi: 10.1007/bf00166499.
Lakatos, Imre. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Editado por Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, 91-196.
Laudan, Larry. “Demystifying Underdetermination.” In Scientific Theories. Editado por C. Wade Savage. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990, 267-297.
Laudan, Larry; Leplin, Jarrett. “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (1991): 449-472. doi: 10.2307/2026601.
Maiocchi, Roberto. Chimica e filosofie: Scienza, epistemologia, storia e religione nell’ opera di Pierre Duhem. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1985.
Maiocchi, Roberto. “Pierre Duhem’s Aim and Structure of Physical Theory: A Book Against Conventionalism.” Synthese 83, no. 3 (1990): 385-400.
Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1900 [1867].
Mongin, Philippe. “Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory.” In Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, vol. 276. Editado por Anastasios Brenner e Jean Gayon. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, 303-357. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_13
Moretti, Luca. “The Tacking by Disjunction Paradox: Bayesianism versus Hypothetico-deductivism.” Erkenntnis 61, no. 1 (2006): 115-138.
Morgan, Marry S.; Morrison, Margaret. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.
Quine, Willard van Orman. “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World.” Erkenntnis 9, no. 3 (1975): 313-328.
Scerri, Eric R. “Editorial.” Foundations of Chemistry 2, no. 2 (2000): 95-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1009930610570.
Sosa, Ernest. “The Coherence of Virtue and the Virtue of Coherence: Justification in Epistemology.” Synthese 64, no. 1 (1985): 3-28. doi: 10.1007/bf00485710.
Sosa, Ernest. “Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology.” Noûs 27, no. 1 (1993): 51-65. doi:10.2307/2215895.
Sosa, Ernest. “Beyond Internal Foundations to External Virtues”, in Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
Stanford, Kyle. “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?” Philosophy of Science 68, no. S3 (2001): S1-S12. doi: 10.1086/392893.
Strevens, Michael. “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.” The Journal of Philosophy 100, no. 2 (2003): 55-79. doi: 10.5840/jphil2003100224.
Stump, David. “Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38, no. 1 (2007): 149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.010.
Van Fraassen, Bas. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.
Zagzebski, Linda T. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.