Hugo Rajão, “Capabilities e Rendimento Básico Incondicional: Um Estudo Introdutório sobre as Possibilidades de Compatibilização,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74, no. 2–3 (2018): 695–728, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_2_0695.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Hugo Rajão |
| Rights | © 2018 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2018 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 695-728 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 |
| Date | 2018 |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_2_0695 |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Abstract | This article is an introductory study on the possibilities of the relation between the capability approach and the implementation of an unconditional basic income. In that sense, in the first part I shall analize in what way Philippe Van Parijs can or can not handle the problem of the conversion, as theorized by Amartya Sen. In the second part, conversely, I will inquire to what extent is the UBI implementation compatible with the theory of justice of Martha Nussbaum. |
| Date Added | 20/10/2018, 22:20:20 |
| Modified | 22/10/2018, 14:31:14 |
Anderson, Elisabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?”. Ethics 109, no. 2 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
Anderson, Elisabeth. “Justifying the capabilities approach to justice”. In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by Harry Brighouse & Ingrid Robeyns, 81-100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Barclay, Linda. “What kind of liberal is Martha Nussbaum?”. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 4, no. 2 (2003).
Barclay, Linda. “The Importance of Equal Respect: What the Capabilities Approach Can and Should Learn from Human Rights Law”. Political Studies 64, no. 2 (2016), https:// doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12175.
Claassen, Rutger. “The Capability to Hold Property”. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16, no. 2 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2014.939061.
Dworkin, Ronald. “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”. Philosophy and Public Affair 10, no. 4 (1981), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265047.
Marneffe, Peter. “Liberalism, Liberty and Neutrality”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19, no. 3 (1990), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265396.
Nelson, Eric. “From Primary Goods to Capabilities: Distributive Justice and the Problem of Neutrality”. Political Theory 36, no.1 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310088.
Nussbaum, Martha. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Nussbaum, Martha. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 2006.
Nussbaum, Martha. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 2011.
Pogge, Thomas. “Can the Capability Approach Be Justified?”. Philosophical Topics 30, no. 2 (2002), https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics200230216.
Rawls, John. “Social unity and primary goods”. In Utilitarianism and beyond, edited by Amartya Sen & Bernard Williams, 159-185. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Rawls, Rawls. A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 1999.
Richardson, Henry. “The Social Background of Capabilities for Freedoms”. Journal of Human Development 8, no. 3 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880701462213.
Robeyns, Ingrid. “Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement”. Social Indicators Research 74 (2005), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1.
Robeyns, Ingrid. “Justice as Fairness and the Capability Approach”. In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen: Volume II, edited by Kaushik Basu & Ravi Kanbur, 497-413.New Delhi: Oxford Univerity Press, 2008.
Robeyns, Ingrid. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 2017.
Sen, Amartya. “Equality of What?”. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, edited by Sterling McMurrin, 1997-220. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1980.
Sen, Amartya. “Poor, Relatively Speaking”. Oxford Economic Papers New Series 35, no.2 (1983), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2662642.
Sen, Amartya. “Justice: Means versus Freedoms”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19, no. 2 (1990), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265406.
Sen, Amartya. Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.
Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999.
Sen, Amartya. The Idea os Justice. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press, 2009.
Silvers, Anita. “Reconciling Equality to Difference: Caring (F)or Justice For People With Disabilities”. Hypatia 10 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01352.x.
Terzi, Lorella. “What metric for disabled people? Capability and disability”. In Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities, edited by Harry Brighouse & Ingrid Robeyns, 150-173. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Van Parijs, Philippe. “Why Surfers Should be Fed: The Liberal Case for an Unconditional Basic Income”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, no. 2 (1991), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265291.
Van Parijs, Philippe. Real Freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Van Parijs, Philippe & Vanderborght, Yannick. Basic Income: A Radical proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Wolff, Jonathan & De-Shalit, Avner. Disadvantage . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
