Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts

On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts

Julia Telles de Menezes, “On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72, no. 2–3 (2016): 573–96, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2016_72_2_0573.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

137220573

Disponível apenas on-line



On the Deferential Use of Phenomenal Concepts

  • Type Journal Article
    Author Julia Telles de Menezes
    Rights © 2016 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    Volume 72
    Issue 2-3
    Pages 573-596
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    ISSN 0870-5283; 2183-461X
    Date 2016
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2016_72_2_0573
    Language English
    Abstract Recently certain physicalists have mobilized a special kind of concept in order to respond to some challenges to the physicalist thesis, challenges that aim to show the apparent incompatibility between the subjective character of consciousness (qualia) and physicalism. The paper will be divided in three parts, first, I will take some time to deal with terminology issues and contextualize the debate around phenomenal concepts. Next, I want to expose Michael Tye and Derek Ball’s objection to the conception of phenomenal concepts and finally I want to propose that Ball and Tye’s argument is flawed. First, it is problematic to apply social externalism to phenomenal concepts. However, granting that this might be the case, we may still change phenomenal concepts constraints as suggested by Torin Alter. My conclusion is that although Ball and Tye show that possession condition may not be what marks the difference between phenomenal and physical concepts, the drastic conclusion that there are no phenomenal concept is false.
    Date Added 19/10/2016, 12:26:49
    Modified 25/10/2016, 10:16:59

    Keywords:

    • phenomenal concepts,
    • philosophy of mind,
    • physicalism,
    • social externalism

    References:

    • Alter, Torin. “Social externalism and the knowledge argument.” Mind 122, issue 486 (2013): 481–496. DOI 10.1093/mind/fzt072
      Alter, Torin and Sven Walter. Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism, Philosophy of Mind Series, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI 10.1093/mind/fzn087
      Ball, Derek. “There are no phenomenal concepts.” Mind 118, issue 472 (2009): 935–962. DOI 10.1093/mind/fzp134
      Balog, Katalin. “Conceivability, possibility and the mind-body problem.” Philosophical Review 108, no. 4 (1999): 497–528. DOI 10.2307/2998286
      Balog, Katalin. “Phenomenal Concepts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by Brian McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann and Sven Walter, 292-312. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199262618.001.0001
      Balog, Katalin. “In defense of the phenomenal concept strategy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, no. 1 (2012): 1–23. DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00541.x
      Burge, Tyler. “Individualism and the mental,” in Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Vol. 1 (1979): 73-122. DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x
      Chalmers, David. The Character of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
      Hill, Christopher S. “Imaginability, conceivability, possibility and the mind-body problem.” Philosophical Studies, 87, no. 1 (1997): 61–85.                     DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665822.003.0007 
      Jackson, Frank. “Epiphenomenal qualia.” Philosophical Quaterly, 32, no. 127 (1982): 127–36. DOI 10.2307/2960077
      Lewis, David. K. “What experience teaches.” In There’s something about Mary. Essays on phenomenal consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge argument, edited by Peter Ludlow, Yujin Nagasawa, and Daniel Stoljar, 77-104. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.
      Loar, Brian. “Phenomenal states.” Philosophical Perspectives, 4 (1990): 81–108.            DOI 10.2307/2214188
      Loar, Brian. “Phenomenal states (second version).” In The nature of consciousness. Philosophical debates, edited by Ned Block, Owen Flanagan, and Güven Güzeldre, 597-616. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997. 
      Ludlow, Peter, Yujin Nagasawa, and Daniel Stoljar (Eds.). There’s something about Mary. Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge argument. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.
      Papineau, David. Thinking About Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.         DOI 10.1093/0199243824.001.0001
      Papineau, David. “Phenomenal and Perceptual Concepts,” in  Phenomenal concepts and phenomenal knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 126-127.         DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195171655.003.0007
      Stoljar, Daniel. “Physicalism and Phenomenal Concepts,” Mind and language 20, no. 2 (2005). DOI 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00296.x
      Tye, Michael. Consciousness revisited. Materialism without phenomenal concepts. Cambridge/London: MIT press, 2009. DOI 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012737.001.0001
      Veillet Bénédict, “In defense of phenomenal concepts,” Philosophical papers 41, no. 1 (2012). DOI 10.1080/05568641.2012.662808
      Wells, G.H. The country of the blind, in The Country of the Blind and other Stories, (Penguin, 2007).

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa