Bermúdez, José. “What is at stake in the debate on nonconceptual content?” Philosophical Perspectives 21, (2007): 55-72.
Camp, Elizabeth. “A language of baboon thought.” In The Philosophy of Animal Minds, edited by Robert Lurz, 108-127. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Campbell, John. Reference and Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Evans, Gareth. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.
Fodor, Jery. “Burge on perception.” In The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts, edited by Eric Margolis, and Stephen Laurence, 203-222. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2015.
Gibson, James. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classical Edition. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2015.
Heck, Richard. “Nonconceptual content and the space of reasons.” The Philosophical Review 109, (2000): 483-523.
Hutto, Daniel and Erick Myin. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.
Mandler, Jean. “Perceptual and conceptual process in infancy.” Journal of Cognition and Development 1, no. 1 (2000): 3-36.
McDowell, John. Mind and World. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1996.
McDowell, John. “Avoiding the myth of the given.” In Having the World in View, 256-274. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Murphy, Gregory. The Big Book of Concepts. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2004.
Nanay, Bence. “Empirical Problems with Anti-Representationalism.” In Does Perception Have Content?, edited by Berit Brogaard, 39-50. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Noë, Alva. Action in Perception. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006.
Noë, Alva. Varieties of Presence. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Noë, Alva. “Conceptual Pluralism, Direct Perception, and the Fragility of Presence.” In Open MIND: 27(T), edited by Thomas Metzinger, and Jennifer Windt, 1-15. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group, 2015. DOI 10.15502/9783958570597.
Pylyshyn, Zenon. Seeing and Visualizing: It’s Not What You Think. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2003.
Quinn, Paul, and Peter Eimas. “A reexamination of the perceptual-to-conceptual shift in mental representations.” Review of General Psychology 1, no. 3 (1997): 271-287, 1997.
Raftopoulos, Athanassios. “The cognitive impenetrability of perception and theory-ladenness.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 46, (2015): 87-103.
Ryle, Gilbert. “Knowing how and knowing that.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46, (1945): 1-16.
Sellars, Wilfrid. Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.
Siegel, Susan. “Cognitive penetrability and perceptual justification.” Noûs 46, no. 2 (2012): 201-222.
Stalnaker, Robert. “What might nonconceptual content be?” Philosophical Issues 9, (1998): 339–352.
Weiskopf, Daniel. “Observational concepts.” In The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts, edited by Eric Margolis, and Stephen Laurence, 227-234. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2015.