Apostolado da Oração


Cuatro Problemas Fenomenológicos Fundamentales en las Lecciones de Husserl en Londres

Cuatro Problemas Fenomenológicos Fundamentales en las Lecciones de Husserl en Londres

Hernán Gabriel Inverso, “Cuatro Problemas Fenomenológicos Fundamentales en las Lecciones de Husserl en Londres,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73, no. 3–4 (2017): 1581–1606, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2017_73_3_1581.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €


Disponível apenas on-line

Cuatro Problemas Fenomenológicos Fundamentales en las Lecciones de Husserl en Londres

Type Journal Article
Author Hernán Gabriel Inverso
Rights © 2018 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2018 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Volume 73
Issue 3-4
Pages 1581-1606
Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
ISSN 0870-5283; 2183-461X
Date 2017
DOI 10.17990/RPF/2017_73_3_1581
Language Spanish
Abstract The London Lectures that Husserl delivered in 1922 are part of a broader program aimed at the systematic presentation of phenomenology. Within this framework, several strategies are deployed to address core disciplinary problems. Among them, this paper examines four aspects: the appeal to historiography in order to build a story that supports the fundamental theoretical decisions, the criticism of psychologism, the redefinition of the notion of transcendental and the specification of the disciplinary scope. These developments allow an assessment of the London Lessons that recognize its peculiarities and avoid a disparaging consideration as mere preliminary version of the Paris Lectures, and legitimize a deeper study of husserlian presentations of phenomenology.
Date Added 17/01/2018, 18:31:35
Modified 18/01/2018, 10:54:22


  • Husserl,
  • method,
  • phenomenology,
  • psychologism


  • Aertsen, J., Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez, PHD Thesis, 2012.
    Albert, H., Traktat über kritische Vernunft, Tübingen: Mohr, 1991
    Casement, W., “Husserl and the Philosophy of History”, History and Theory, 27.3 (1988), 229-240.
    Drummond, J., “The Structure of Intentionality”, en R. Bernet, D. Welton y G. Zavota (eds.) Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, London: Routledge, vol. 3, 1975/2005.
    González Porta, M., “Psicologismo e idealismo en Frege y Husserl”, Capa, 117, vol. 37 (2010).
    Gracia, J., “The Transcendentals in the Middle Ages: An Introduction,” Topoi 11, 2 (1995), 113–120.
    Hua: Edmund Husserl, Gesammelte Werke-Husserliana I-LX, Dordrecht, Springer (con anterioridad: Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff; Dordrecht/ Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers), 1950-2009. 
    HuDo: Edmund Husserl, Dokumente 1 – 4, Dordrecht, Springer (con anterioridad: Den Haag, Martinus Nijhoff; Dordrecht/ Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers), 1981-1999.
    Inverso, H., El mundo entre paréntesis. Una arqueología de las nociones de reducción y corporalidad, Buenos Aires: Prometeo, 2015.
    Inverso, H., Fenomenología de lo inaparente, Tesis doctoral de la Universidad de Buenos Aires, 2016.
    Jacquete, D., Philosophy, Psychology and Psychologism, Netherlands: Kluwer, 113-130, 2003.
    Kant, I., Crítica de la razón pura, Trad. de Mario Caimi, Buenos Aires: Colihue, 2007.
    Kern, I., Husserl und Kant: Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus, The Hague: Nijhoff, 1964.
    Kern, I., “The Three Ways to the Transcendental Phenomenological Reduction in the Philosophy of Edmund Husserl”, en F. Elliston et al. (Eds.) Husserl: Exposition and Appraisals, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.
    Luft, S., “Husserl’s Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction: Between life-world and Cartesianism” in Research in Phenomenology, 34.1 (2004), 198 – 234. 
    Makkreel, R. y S. Luft, Neo-kantianism in Contemporary Philosophy, Indiana: Bloomington, 2010.
    Marina Torres, J., “Fenomenología crítica y teoría de la evidencia en Husserl”, Logos, 2 (1967).
    MacDonald, P., Descartes and Husserl. The Philosophical Project of Radical Beginnings, Albany: State University of New York, 2000.
    MacDonald, S., “The Metaphysics of Goodness and the Doctrine of the Transcendentals,,” in Being and Goodness. The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 31–55, 1991.
    Mohanty, J., “The Concept of ‘Psychologism’ in Frege and Husserl”, en D. Jacquette, Philosophy, Psychology and Psychologism, 2003, Kluwer, Netherlands, 113-130 (antes publicado en Philosophy & Rhetoric Vol. 30, No. 3, The Dialectics of Psychologism (1997), 271-290).
    Morrison, J., “Husserl’s “Crisis”: Reflections on the Relationship of Philosophy and History”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 37.3 (1977), 312-330.
    Natorp, P., “Zur Frage der logischen Methode; mit Beziehung auf E. Husserl Prolegomena zur reinen Logik”, Kant Studien, 6 (1901), 270-283. 
    Natorp, P., “Husserls Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie”, Logos, 7 (1917/1919), 224-246.
    Ogden, C. y Richards, I., The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, Cambridge: CUP, 1923.
    Rickert, H., “Zwei Wege der Erkenntnistheorie. Transzendentalpsychologie und Transzendentallogik”, Kant Studien, 14 (1909), 169-228.
    Rizo-Patrón, R., “Husserl lector de Kant. Apuntes sobre la razón y sus límites”, Areté, 24 (2002).
    Rizo-Patrón, R., El exilio del sujeto. Mitos modernos y posmodernos, Lima: Aula, 2015.
    San Martín, J., La fenomenología de Husserl como utopía de la razón, Barcelona: Anthropos, 1987.
    Sánchez Soberano R., E. Husserl, Las conferencias de Londres. Método y filosofía fenomenológicos, Madrid: Sígueme, 2012.
    Sandmeyer, B., Husserl’s Constitutive Phenomenology: Its Problem and Promise, New York: Routledge, 2009.
    Sanoianni, F., The Concept of Time in Early Twentieth-Century Philosophy: A Philosophical Thematic Atlas, Heidelberg – New York: Springer, 2015.
    Schmid, H., “Apodictic Evidence”, Husserl Studies, 10 (2001), 217-237.
    Seebohm, T. M., “Psychologism Revisited”. In T. Seebohm; D. Föllesdall; & J. N. Mohanty (Eds.), Phenomenology and the formal sciences, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 149-182, 1991.
    Seebohm, T., “History as a Science and the System of the Sciences: Phenomenological Investigations”, Contributions to Phenomenology, 77 (2015).
    Sexto Empírico, Esbozos pirrónicos, Madrid: Gredos, 1993.
    Spiegelberg, H., The Context of the Phenomenological Movement, Dordrecht: Springer, 1981.
    Staiti, A., “The Pedagogic Impulse of Husserl’s Ways into Transcendental Phenomenology”, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, 33.1 (2012).
    Staiti, A., “Husserl’s Transcendental Phenomenology: Nature, Spirit and Life”, Cambridge: CUP, 2014.
    Villanueva Barreto, J., “The Transcendental Motive in Kant and Husserl”, Estudios de filosofía, 39 (2009), 55-80.
    Welton, D., The Other Husserl. The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2000.


Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar