Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Sobre la Influencia de Zenón de Elea en el Grupo Megárico

Sobre la Influencia de Zenón de Elea en el Grupo Megárico

Mariana Gardella, “Sobre la Influencia de Zenón de Elea en el Grupo Megárico,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 1 (2019): 697–724, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0697.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

137510697

Disponível apenas on-line

Sobre la Influencia de Zenón de Elea en el Grupo Megárico

Type Journal Article
Author Mariana Gardella
Rights © 2019 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Volume 75
Issue 1
Pages 697-724
Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
ISSN 0870-5283
Date 2019
DOI 10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0697
Language Spanish
Abstract The aim of this paper is to revisit the problem about the influence of preceding philosophical theories on the Megaric group. Against the traditional view which defend either the influence of Parmenides or that of Socrates, I will try to show the impact of the philosophical position of Zeno of Elea. I will aim to defend that the Megarics use Zenonian antilogy as a part of eristic refutation. In the first section of this paper, I will present and discuss the aforementioned interpretations that privilege either the Parmenidean or the Socratic influence on the Megarics. Then I will analyze the grounds and scope of Zenonian antilogy taking into account all the testimonies which present it as a tool to dicuss theories, rather than to defend them. Finally, I will show how the Megarics use Zenonian antilogy to construct paradoxes based on the numerous ambiguities concerning the signifier and meaning of words, predication, and reasoning, in order to reveal the limits of lógos and refute those who use it as a tool to grasp reality.
Date Added 24/04/2019, 19:28:12
Modified 24/04/2019, 21:12:26

Tags:

  • antilogy,
  • Megarics,
  • paradoxes,
  • refutation,
  • Zeno of Elea

Notes:

  • Allen, Reginald E. Platos’ Parmenides. Translated with comment. Chelsea: Yale University Press, 1997 [1º ed. 1983].
    Barnes, Jonathan. “Parmenides and the Eleatic One.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61, no. 1 (1979): 1-21.
    Barnes, Jonathan. The Presocratic Philosophers. New York: Routledge, 1982 [1º ed. 1979].
    Boys-Stones, George and Rowe, Christopher. The Circle of Socrates: Readings in the First-Generation Socratics. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2013.
    Brancacci, Aldo. “Socratism and Eleaticism in Euclides of Megara.” In Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue, edited by Alessandro Stavru and Christopher Moore, 161-178. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2018.
    Brisson, Luc. Platon. Parménide. Paris: Flammarion, 1994. 
    Cambiano, Giuseppe. “La scuola megarica nelle interpretazioni moderne.” Rivista di Filosofia 62 (1971): 227-253.
    Cambiano, Giuseppe. “Il problema dell’esistenza di una scuola megarica.” In Scuole socratiche minori e filosofia ellenistica, edited by Gabriele Giannantoni, 25-53. Bolonia: Il Mulino, 1977. 
    Castelnérac, Benoît and Marion, Mathieu. “Antilogic.” The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 8 (2013): 1-31.
    Caveing, Maurice. Zénon et le continu. Paris: Vrin, 2009 [1º ed. 1982].
    Chantraine, Pierre. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck, 1968-1977.
    Cordero, Néstor L. “Zénon d’Élée, moniste ou nihiliste?.” La parola del passato 43 (1988): 100-126.
    Cordero, Néstor L. “L’invention de l’école éléatique (Platon, Sophiste 242d).” In Études sur le Sophiste de Platon, edited by Pierre Aubenque, 93-124. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1991.
    Cornelli, Gabriele. In Search of Pythagoreanism. Pythagoreanism As an Historiographical Category. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013.
    Curd, Patricia. The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing, 2004 [1º ed. 1998].
    Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walter. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmann, 1954 [1º ed. 1903].
    Döring, Klaus. Die Megariker. Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien. Amsterdam: Grüner, 1972.
    Dorion, Louis-André. Aristote. Les réfutations sophistiques. Paris: Vrin, 1995.
    Drozdek, Adam. Greek Philosophers as Theologians. The Divine Arche. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.
    Dumont, Jean-Paul. Les écoles présocratiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1991 [1º ed. 1988]. 
    Ferrari, Franco. Platone. Parmenide. Milano: Rizzoli, 2004. 
    Field, Guy. Plato and his Contemporaries. A Study in Fourth Century Life and Thought. London: Methuen, 1967.
    Fränkel, Hermann. “Zeno of Elea’s Attacks on Plurality.” In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, edited by Reginald. E. Allen and David. J. Furley, 102-142. Vol II. New Jersey, Atlantic Highlands Humanities Press, 1975 [1º ed. 1942]. 
    Gagarin, Michael. Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of the Sophists. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.
    Gardella, Mariana. “Euclides de Mégara, filósofo socrático.” Ágora 33, no. 2 (2014): 19-37.
    Gardella, Mariana. “La metafísica megárica: unidad, identidad y monismo predicativo.” Diánoia 59, no. 73 (2014): 3-26.
    Gardella, Mariana. “Antilogía y gimnasia intelectual. La interpretación de Platón sobre Zenón de Elea.” Méthexis 28 (2016): 14-32.
    Giannantoni, Gabriele. Socratis et socraticorum reliquiae. 4 vols. Napoli: Bibliopolis, 1990.
    Giombini, Stefania and Marcacci, Flavia. “Dell’antilogia.” In Il quinto secolo. Studi di filosofia antica in onore di Livio Rossetti, edited by Stefania Giombini and Flavia Marcacci, 277-294. Aguaplano: Città di Castello, 2010.
    Graham, Daniel W. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The complete fragments and selected testimonies of the major Presocratics. Vol. I. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
    Hawtrey, Ralph S. W. Commentary on Plato’s Euthydemus. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1981.
    Hitchcock, David. “The Origin of Professional Eristic.” In Plato. Euthydemus, Lysis, Charmides. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium Platonicum, edited by Thomas Robinson and Luc Brisson, 59-67. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2000.
    Hopkins, Phil. “Zeno’s Boétheia Tôi Logôi: Thought Problems about Problems for Thought.” Epoché 11, no. 1 (2006): 3-27.
    Humbert, Jean. Socrate et les petits socratiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1967.
    Kerferd, George B. The Sophistic Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
    Lee, Henry D. P. Zeno of Elea. A text with translation and notes. London: Cambridge University Press, 1967 [1º ed. 1936].
    Liddell, Henry G.; Scott, Robert and Jones, Henry S. Greek-English Lexicon. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
    Mársico, Claudia. “Ni el hombre es blanco ni el caballo corre. Argumentos antiplatónicos en Estilpón de Mégara.” Méthexis 25 (2012): 17-34.
    Mársico, Claudia. Filósofos socráticos. Testimonios y fragmentos I: Megáricos y cirenaicos. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2013. 
    Mársico, Claudia. Filósofos socráticos. Testimonios y fragmentos II: Antístenes, Fedón, Esquines y Simón. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2014. 
    Matelli, Elisabetta. “L’anno 431 a. C. e le antilogie di Euripide, Protagora, Tucidide.” Aevum 74, no. 1 (2000): 21-46.
    Montoneri, Luciano. I Megarici. Studio storico – critico e traduzione delle testimonianze antiche. Catania: Università di Catania, 1984. 
    Muller, Robert. Les mégariques. Fragments et témoignages traduits et commentés. Paris: Vrin, 1985.
    Palmer, John. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Rapp, Christof. “Zeno and the Eleatic Anti-pluralism.” In La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei Presocratici, edited by Maria M. Sassi, 161-182. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2006.
    Rosenthal, Franz. “Arabische Nachrichten über Zenon den Eleaten.” Orientalia 6 (1937): 21-67.
    Rossetti, Livio. “Ricerche sui ‘Dialoghi Socratici’ di Fedone e di Euclide.” Hermes 108, no. 2 (1980): 183-200.
    Rossetti, Livio. “Un filosofo senza filosofia.” In Eleatica 2008: Zenone e l’infinito, edited by Livio Rossetti y Massimo Pulpito, 171-184. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 2011. 
    Santa Cruz, M. Isabel. Platón. Parménides. Madrid: Gredos, 1988.
    Sedley, David. “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 23 (1977): 74-120.
    Solmsen, Friedrich. “The Tradition about Zeno of Elea Re-Examined.” Phronesis 16, no. 2 (1971): 116-141.
    Szlezák, Thomas A. Reading Plato. London: Routledge, 2005 [1° 1993].
    Tannery, Paul. Pour l’histoire de la science hellène. De Thalès à Empédocle. Paris: Alcan, 1887.
    Tarán, Leonardo. Parmenides. A text with translation, commentary, and critical essays. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1965. 
    Untersteiner, Mario. Zenone. Testimonianze e frammenti. Introduzione, traduzione e commento. Firenze: La nuova Italia, 1970 [1º ed. 1963].
    Vlastos, Gregory. “Plato’s Testimony concerning Zeno of Elea.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 95 (1975): 136-162.
    Von Fritz, Kurt. “Megariker.” In Pauly-Wissowa Realenzyklopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, supl. V, coll. 707-724. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1931.
    Zilioli, Ugo. Protagoras and the Challenge of Relativism. Plato’s Subtlest Enemy. Wiltshire: Ashgate, 2007.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa