Gehad Marcon Bark, “Espontaneidade Prática e Agir Racional: Apontamentos acerca de uma Possível Tensão na Relação entre as Leis Jurídicas e a Moralidade no Pensamento Kantiano,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 1 (2019): 599–636, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0599.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Gehad Marcon Bark |
| Rights | © 2019 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 599-636 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 |
| Date | 2019 |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0599 |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Abstract | By discussing Kant’s practical philosophy through what could be called, according to Henry Allison’s interpretation, the human rational agency, this paper aims at approaching a potential exegetical problem concerning the relation between juridical laws and morality in the Metaphysics of Morals. Through the incorporation thesis, Allison proposes that every rational action, even those based on inclinations and desires, are to be taken, at some degree, as spontaneous, by demanding that one adopt a rule of action, i.e. imperatives in general, as a reason to act in some way. Although vital to the task of understanding desire-based actions not as merely causal consequences of inclinations, this line of interpretation apparently entails that juridical laws do not need to be based on the categorical imperative. The point is: as long as imperative-based actions in general are taken as spontaneous, merely obligation through inclinations and aversions seems to be a sufficient condition to understand what is typical of juridical laws, therefore precluding, at least apparently, the necessity to appeal to a categorical imperative that is known to found Kantian morality by demanding an action to be taken as a duty by itself. |
| Date Added | 24/04/2019, 19:28:08 |
| Modified | 24/04/2019, 21:06:48 |
Allison, Henry E. “Autonomy and Spontaneity in Kant’s conception of the self”, In Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy, editado por Henry E. Allison, 129-142. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: a commentary. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Allison, Henry E. “Kant on Freedom: a reply to my critics”, In Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy, editado por Henry E. Allison, 109-128. Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne and Sydney: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2004.
Almeida, Guido Antônio de. “Liberdade e Moralidade segundo Kant”. Analytica 2, no.1, (1997), https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/view/404/361.
Almeida, Guido Antônio de. “Sobre o Princípio e a Lei Universal do Direito em Kant”. Kryterion 47, no 114, (2006), http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v47n114/a0247114.pdf.
Kant, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. Tradução de Alexandre Fradique Morujão e Manuela Pinto dos Santos. 7. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2010.
Kant, Immanuel. Crítica da Razão Pura. Tradução de Udo Baldur Moosburger e Valerio Rohden. 2. ed. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1983.
Kant, Immanuel. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Ditzingen: Reclam, 2016.
Kant, Immanuel. Fundamentação da Metafísica dos Costumes. Tradução de Guido Antônio de Almeida. São Paulo: Discurso Editorial; Barcarolla, 2009.
Kant, Immanuel. “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”, In Werkausgabe, Band VII. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2014.
Kant, Immanuel. “Kritik der reinen Vernunft”, In Werkausgabe, Bände III und IV. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2014.
Kant, Immanuel. Princípios Metafísicos da Doutrina do Direito. Tradução de Joãosinho Beckenkamp. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2014.
Kant, Immanuel. “Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft”, In Kants gesammelte Schriften, Band VI, Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin. George Reimer, 1914.
Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Tradução de Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Paton, H. J. The Categorical Imperative: a study in Kant’s moral philosophy. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1971.
Schneewind, J. B. “Autonomy, Obligation and Virtue”, in The Cambridge companion to Kant, editado por Paul Guyer, 309-341. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
