La Crítica de Kant a la Doctrina de la Guerra Justa
Fiorella Tomassini, “La Crítica de Kant a la Doctrina de la Guerra Justa,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 1 (2019): 423–46, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0423.
Fiorella Tomassini, “La Crítica de Kant a la Doctrina de la Guerra Justa,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 1 (2019): 423–46, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0423.
Type | Journal Article |
---|---|
Author | Fiorella Tomassini |
Rights | © 2019 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
Volume | 75 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 423-446 |
Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
ISSN | 0870-5283 |
Date | 2019 |
DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2019_75_1_0423 |
Language | Spanish |
Abstract | In the 17th and 18th centuries, the doctrine of just war was one of the most popular theories in international law. According to this doctrine, the right to war is an integral part of natural law and, under specific circumstances, morally justified. To my mind, Kant was a fervent critic of the theory of just war. He critically reformulates the rational and normative principles of right in a way that leaves no place for war as a legitimate procedure to resolve a conflict between states. In section (i), I shall analyze the fundamental principles of ius gentium, in particular, the duty to leave the state of nature at the international level and the juridical form that the association between states must adopt. The exit of the state of nature between nations must generate an international legal framework that not only protects human rights but also safeguards the sovereignty of the peoples. In section (ii), I shall examine Kant’s critique of the doctrine of just war in Zum ewigen Frieden and in the Rechtslehre, exploring why the idea of an ius ad bellum is incompatible with the critical reformulation of the right of nations proposed there. |
Date Added | 24/04/2019, 19:27:59 |
Modified | 24/04/2019, 20:55:15 |
Byrd, Sharon, y Hruschka, Joachim. Kant´s Doctrine of Right. A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Cavallar, Georg. The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community and Political Justice since Vitoria. Londres: Ashgate, 2002.
Geismann, Georg. “Kants Rechtslehre vom Weltfrieden“. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, vol. 37 (1983): 363-88.
Höffe, Otfried. „Völkerbund oder Weltrepublik?“. En Immanuel Kant. Zum ewigen Frieden, editado por Höffe, O., 109-32. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2004.
Höffe, Otfried. Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Kleingeld, Pauline. Kant and Cosmopolitanism. The philosophical Ideal of World Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Maus, Ingeborg. “Volkssouveränität und das Prinzip der Nichtintervention in der Friedensphilosophie Immanuel Kants“. En Einmischung erwünscht? Menschenrechte in einer Welt der Bürgerkriege, editado por Brunkhorst, H., 88-116. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1998.
Onuf, Nicholas. “Civitas maxima: Wolff, Vattel and the Fate of Republicanism”. The American Journal of International Law, vol. 88, no. 2 (1994): 280 – 303.
Orend, Brian. War and International Justice: A Kantian Perspective. Waterloo: Wilfrid Lauier University Press, 2002.
Reibstein, Ernst. “Deutsche Grotius – Kommentatoren bis zu Christian Wolff“. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 15 (1953), 76-102.
Riley, Patrick. “The Abbé de St. Pierre and Voltaire on Perpetual Peace in Europe”. World Affairs, vol. 137, no. 3 (1974), 186-94.
Roff, Heather. Global Justice, Kant and the Responsibility to Protect. Londres: Routledge, 2013.
Shell, Susan. “Kant on Unjust War and ‘Unjust Enemies’ reflections on a pleonasm”, Kantian Review, vol. 10 (2012), pp. 85-111.
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars. A moral Argument with Historical Illustrations . Nueva York: Basic Books, 1977.
Williams, Howards. Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.