Apostolado da Oração


Project-Based Learning Experiences Devised by Combining Backward Educational Design and Design Thinking

Project-Based Learning Experiences Devised by Combining Backward Educational Design and Design Thinking

Mihai A. Gîrțu and Daniela D. Căprioară, “Project-Based Learning Experiences Devised by Combining Backward Educational Design and Design Thinking,” in Higher Education in a Digital Era through Project-Based E-Learning: Contributes of the RESTART4EDU Project, ed. Paulo C. Dias et al., Psicologia 10 (Braga: Axioma - Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia, 2023), 99–124,

Mais detalhes

0,00 €


  • Project-Based Learning Experiences Devised by Combining Backward Educational Design and Design Thinking

    Item Type Book Section
    Editor Paulo C. Dias
    Editor Ângela Sá Azevedo
    Editor Íris Oliveira
    Editor Elif Kara
    Editor Onur Ergünay
    Editor Haci Mustafa Dönmez
    Editor Mihai Girtu
    Editor Daniela D. Căprioară
    Author Mihai A. Gîrțu
    Author Daniela D. Căprioară
    Date 2023
    Language English
    Rights © 2023 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Place Braga
    Publisher Axioma - Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia
    ISBN 978-972-697-366-9
    Pages 99-124
    Series Psicologia
    Series Number 10
    Book Title Higher Education in a Digital Era through Project-based E-learning: Contributes of the RESTART4EDU Project
    Date Added 7/21/2023, 10:30:30 PM
    Modified 7/21/2023, 10:45:03 PM


    • Educational Design
    • Educational Technologies
    • Pedagogy
    • Project-Based Learning
    • Psychology


    • Anderson, L.W., and Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). editors: A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, NY.

      Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 10, 1–11.

      Baepler, P., Walker, J.D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.

      Banchi, H. & Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry. Science and Children, 46, 26-29.

      Barrows, H.S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Leraning, 3-12.

      Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernandez-Ortega, B., Sese, F.J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102-110.

      Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M., D., Furst, E.J, Hill, W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals (Vol. 1). The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

      Bloom, B.S., Masia, B.B. and Krathwohl, D. R. (1964),Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Vol. II): The Affective Domain. New York: McKay.

      Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.

      Bower, G. H. (1992). How might emotions affect learning? In S.-Å. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 3–31). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

      Brown, T. (2009) Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, Harper Collins, New York.

      CEDEFOP (2017). Defining, writing and applying learning outcomes – A European handbook, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. available at

      Dave, R.H. (1970). Psychomotor levels. In: Armstrong, R.J. (ed.). Developing and writing behavioral objectives. Tucson, Arizona: Educational Innovators Press.

      DeNeve, K.M., Heppner, M.J. (1997) Role play simulations: The assessment of an active learning technique and comparisons with traditional lectures. Innovative Higher Education, 21, 231–246.

      Doorley, S., Holcomb, S., Klebahn, P., Segovia, K., and Utley, J. (2018) Design Thinking Bootleg, Stanford University (available at:

      Estai, M., & Bunt, S. (2016). Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Annals of Anatomy – Anatomischer Anzeiger, 208, 151-157.

      European Commission (2011). Using learning outcomes: European qualifications framework series: Note 4. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Available at

      European Council (2018) Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning ST/9009/2018/INIT, (2018/C 189/01), available at

      Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410–8415.

      Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The Changing Role of Education and Schools. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, 1-15.

      Hakkarainen P., Vapalahti K. (2011). Meaningful learning through video-supported forum-theater. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23, 314–328.

      Harmin, M., and Toth, M. (2006) Inspiring Active Learning: A Complete Handbook for Today’s Teachers, Expanded 2nd Edition, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Alexandria, VA.

      HQ PBL (2018), A Framework for High Quality Project-Based Learning. Available at

      IDEO (2012). Design Thinking for Educators, 2nd ed., IDEO LLC, available online at

      Immordino-Yang, M.H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education. Mind Brain and Education, 1, 3-10.

      Jonassen, D.J., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002) Case-Based Reasoning and Instructional Design: Using Stories to Support Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 65-77.

      Kelley, T., Kelley, D. (2013) Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All, Crown Business, New York.

      Kennedy D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. Quality Promotion Unit, University College Cork. Cork. Available online at

      Kennedy, D., Hyland, Á. & Ryan, N. (2009a). Learning outcomes and competences, in Froment, E., Kohler, J., Purser, L., & Wilson L. (eds.): EUA Bologna Handbook – Making Bologna Work, article B 2.3-3. Raabe Verlag, Berlin.

      Kennedy, D., Hyland, Á., & Ryan, N., (2009b). Writing and Using Learning Outcomes: a Practical Guide, in Froment, E., Kohler, J., Purser, L., & Wilson L. (eds.): EUA Bologna Handbook – Making Bologna Work, article C 3.4-1. Raabe Verlag, Berlin.

      Kester, L., Kirschner, P.A., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Baumer, A. (2001). Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 373-391.

      Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Alexandria, VA.

      Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Larry Leifer, L. (2018). The Design Thinking Playbook: Mindful Digital Transformation of Teams, Products, Services, Businesses and Ecosystems. Wiley, NY.

      Lewrick, M., Link, P. & Larry Leifer, L. (2020) The Design Thinking Toolbox: A Guide to Mastering the Most Popular and Valuable Innovation Methods, Wiley, NY.

      Mayer, R.E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., Bulger, M., Campbell, J., Knight, A., & Zhang, H. (2009) Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 51-57.

      Mayhew, E., (2019) No Longer a Silent Partner: How Mentimeter Can Enhance Teaching and Learning Within Political Science, Journal of Political Science Education, 15:4, 546-551.

      McTighe, J., and Wiggins, G.P., (2013). Essential Questions. Opening Doors to Student Understanding Association for Supervision and Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.

      Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What Makes a Good Student? How Emotions, Self-Regulated Learning, and Motivation Contribute to Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121–131.

      Minner, D.D., Levy, A.J., & Century, J (2010). Inquiry-Based Science Instruction – What Is It and Does It Matter? Results from a Research Synthesis Years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 474-496.

      National Research Council – Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards (2000), available at

      OECD (2016) Working paper: Education 2030: Key competencies for the future, available at

      OECD (2018), The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. Position paper, available at

      OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030 Concept Note (2019) available at

      Oliver, R., Kersten, H., Vinkka-Puhakka, H., Alpasan, G., Bearn, D., Cema, I., Delap, E., Dummer, P., Goulet, J.P., Gugushe, T., Jeniati, E., Jerolimov, V., Kotsanos, N., Krifka, S., Levy, G., Neway, M., Ogawa, T., Saag, M., Sidlauskas, A., Skaleric, U., Vervoorn, M. and White, D. (2008), Curriculum structure: principles and strategy. European Journal of Dental Education, 12, 74 – 84.

      Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328, 463-466.

      Pekrun, R. (1992). The Impact of Emotions on Learning and Achievement: Towards a Theory of Cognitive/Motivational Mediators. Applied Psychology, 41, 359-376.

      Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, 37, 91-105.

      Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A.C., Barchfeld, P., Perry, R.P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36-48.

      Popham, W.J. (1997). What’s wrong – and what’s right – with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72–75.

      Prahl, K. (2017) Best Practices for the Think-Pair-Share Active-Learning Technique. American Biology Teacher, 79, 3-8.

      Prince, M.J. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223-231.

      Prince, M.J., & Felder, R.M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123-138.

      Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 35, 435-448.

      Smith, K.A., Sheppard, S.D., Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 87-101.

      van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & van de Ven, P.H. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive-affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 917-934.

      Wang, A.I. & Tahir, R (2020) The effect of using Kahoot! for learning – A literature review, Computers & Education, 149, 103818.

      Wiggins, G.P., and McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.

      Wiggins, G.P., and McTighe, J. (2011). The Understanding by Design Guide to Creating High-Quality Units. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD), Alexandria, VA.


Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar