de Boer, Karin - “The Vicissitudes of Metaphysics in Kant and Early Post-Kantian Philosophy”. In: Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia, Vol. 71, N. 2-3, 2015, pp. 267-286. DOI 10.17990/RPF/2015_71_2_0267
The Vicissitudes of Metaphysics in Kant and Early Post-Kantian Philosophy
| Author | Karin de Boer |
|---|---|
| Rights | © 2015 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2015 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 267-286 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283; 2183-461X |
| Date | 2015 |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2015_71_2_0267 |
| Language | English |
| Abstract | Resumo: Não há dúvida que tanto Kant como Hegel viram os seus respectivos trabalhos, como contribuições para aquilo que consideravam ser a “metafísica”. No entanto, a autora argumenta, que isto só deve ser compreendido, tendo presente, as concepções de metafísica de cada um dos autores. A autora, começando pela distinção implícita entre metafísica geral e metafísica especial na Crítica da Razão Pura, argumenta que Kant, Fichte, Schelling e Hegel comprometeram-se com uma investigação que, até essa altura, era do domínio da metafísica geral. A autora, concentrando-se na noção de sistema de razão pura, tal como aludido na Crítica da Razão Pura, mostra, que os sucessores de Kant, interpretaram erroneamente a distinção kantiana entre crítica e sistema, o que permitiu elaborarem um sistema completo de razão pura, contrário àquilo que era intenção de Kant. Palavras-chave: Fichte, Hegel, idealismo alemão, Kant, metafísica, sistema Abstract: There is no doubt that both Kant and Hegel saw their work as contributions to what they considered metaphysics proper. Yet what they meant by this, I argue, can only be understood by taking into account their own conception of metaphysics. Starting from Kant’s implicit distinction between general metaphysics and special metaphysics in the Critique of Pure Reason, I argue that Kant, Fichte, Schelling and Hegel engaged in the investigation that used to be carried out in general metaphysics. Focusing on the notion of a system of pure reason intimated in the Critique of Pure Reason, I show, moreover, that Kant’s successors, while misinterpreting the Kantian distinction between critique and system, elaborated a method that made it possible to produce a complete system of pure reason, albeit one that differed from the system Kant had in mind. Keywords: Fichte, german idealism, Hegel, Kant, metaphysics, system |
| Date Added | 28/07/2015, 12:01:09 |
| Modified | 21/10/2015, 15:29:45 |
BEISER, Frederic C., The Fate of Reason: German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
BREAZEALE, Daniel, “Fichte’s ‘Aenesidemus’ Review and the Transformation of German Idealism”. In: Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 34, Nr. 3 (1981), p. 545-568.
DE BOER, Karin, “Categories versus Schemata: Kant’s Two-Aspect Theory of Pure Concepts and his Critique of Wolffian Metaphysics”. In: Journal of the History of Philosophy, forthcoming.
DE BOER, Karin, “Transformations of Transcendental Philosophy: Wolff, Kant, and Hegel”. In: Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain. Vol. 32, Nr. 1-2 (2011), p. 50-79.
DE BOER, Karin, “Kant’s Multi-Layered Conception of Things-in-Themselves, Transcendental Objects, and Monads”, Kant-Studien, Vol. 105, Nr. 2 (2014), p. 221-260.
DE BOER, Karin, On Hegel: The Sway of the Negative. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
FICHTE, Johann Gottlieb, “An Attempt at a New Presentation of the Wissenschaftslehre”. In: Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings, translated by BREAZEALE, Daniel. Indianapolis / Cambridge: Hackett, 1994.
FICHTE, Johann Gottlieb, Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre oder der sogenannten Philosophie (1794), Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften I,2, edited by LAUTH, Reinhard, JACOBS, Hans, and GLIWITZKY, Hans. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann, 1964.
GERHARDT, Myriam, SELL, Annette, DE VOS, Lu (Eds.) – Metaphysik und Metaphysikkritik in der klassischen Deutschen Philosophie. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2012.
GRANDJEAN, Antoine, Critique et réflexion. Essai sur le discours kantien. Paris: Vrin 2009.
HEGEL, G.W.F., Hegel’s Logic, translated by WALLACE, William. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
HEGEL, G.W.F., Hegel’s Science of Logic, translated by A.V. MILLER. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1969.
HEIDEGGER, Martin, Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 19915.
HENRICH, Dieter and HORSTMANN, Rolf-Peter (Eds.), Metaphysik nach Kant?Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1988.
JACOBI, Friedrich Heinrich, Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefen an den Herrn Moses Mendelssohn (1785), (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag 2000).
JACOBI, Friedrich Heinrich, “Über den Transcendentalen Idealismus”. In JAESCHKE, Walter and PISKE, Irmgard-Maria (Eds.) – David Hume über den Glauben oder Idealismus und Realismus: ein Gespräch, Werke, Band 2,1. Hamburg / Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Meiner / Frommann Holzboog, 2004.
JAESCHKE, Walter and ARNDT, Andreas, Die Klassische Deutsche Philosophie nach Kant: Systeme der reinen Vernunft und ihre Kritik 1785-1845. München: Beck, 2012.
KANT, Immanuel – Critique of Pure Reason, edited and translated by Paul GUYER and Allen W. WOOD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.
KANT, Immanuel, Critique of Practical Reason. In: Practical Philosophy, edited and translated by M. GREGOR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
KANT, Critique of Judgment, edited and translated by Paul GUYER, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
KANT, Kant’s Correspondence, edited and translated by Arnulf ZWEIG. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
KREINES James – “Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate.” In: Philosophy Compass. Vol. 1, Nr. 5 (2006), p. 466-80.
LORD, Beth, Kant and Spinozism: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
SANDKAULEN, Birgit, “Das ‘leidige Ding an sich’. Kant – Jacobi – Fichte”. In STOLZENBERG, Jürgen (Ed.), Kant und der Frühidealismus. Hamburg: Meiner, 2007, p. 175-201.
SCHELLING, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph, System des Transzendentalen Idealismus. Hamburg, Meiner: 1992.
SCHULZE, Gottlob Ernst, Aenesidemus, oder über die Fundamente der von dem Herrn Prof. Reinhold in Jena gelieferten Elementar-Philosophie. Nebst einer Vertheidigung des Skepticismus gegen die Anmaaßungen der Vernunftkritik (1792).
VOLLRATH, Ernst – “Die Gliederung der Metaphysik in eine metaphysica generalis und eine metaphysica specialis”. In: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung. Vol. 16, Nr. 2 (1962), p. 258-284.
WOLFF, Christian – Discursus praeliminaris de philosophia in genere / Einleitende Abhandlung über Philosophie im allgemeinen [1728], translated and edited by GAWLICK, Günther and KREIMENDAHL, Lothar. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1996.
