Paulo R. Licht dos Santos, “Qual o Problema da Dedução Transcendental na Crítica da Razão Pura?,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72, no. 2–3 (2016): 401–34, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2016_72_2_0401.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Paulo R. Licht dos Santos |
| Rights | © 2016 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2016 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 401-434 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283; 2183-461X |
| Date | 2016 |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2016_72_2_0401 |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Abstract | Which is the central problem of the Transcendental Deduction of the Critique of Pure Reason, in its two versions? Amidst the controversy of Kant’s interpreters, I focus on a common reading that can serve as a basis for a critical examination of the central problem of the transcendental deduction. According to this common reading, the transcendental deduction is supposed to prove the application of the pure concepts of the understanding to perceptions or sense data. I try to argue that there are some reasons to believe that this common reading reduces inadequately the scope of the problem of the transcendental deduction and, as a consequence, it reduces the scope of its conclusion, too. In particular, it makes incomprehensible that “the categories are not restricted in thinking by the conditions of our sensible intuition” (B 166 n) and, as such, may have a legitimate role in non-empirical contexts, such as it is required in Kant’s theoretical and practical philosophy. |
| Date Added | 19/10/2016, 12:26:39 |
| Modified | 25/10/2016, 09:46:24 |
Allison, Henry. E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: an Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
Allison, Henry. Kant’s Transcendental Deduction. An Analytical-Historical Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Ameriks, Karl. “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument.” Kant-Studien, 69:3 (1978), 273-287
Caimi, Mario. Leçons sur Kant, La déduction transcendantale dans la deuxième édition de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 2002.
Caimi, Mario. “Zum Problem des Zieles einer Transzendentalen Deduktion”. In: Kant und die Berliner Aufklärung, Akten des XI Kant Internationalenkongress, I, Berlin/New York (2001), 48, n.1.
Cohen , Hermann, H. Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. Reimpr. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag, 1987.
Cohen , Hermann, H. Commentaire de la Critique de la raison purê de Kant. Trad. Eric Dufour. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2000.
Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer (Walter de Gruyter), 1900 em diante. Kant, Immanuel “Carta de Kant a Marcus Herz, de 21 fevereiro de 1772”, trad. Paulo R. Licht dos Santos, O Que nos Faz Pensar, v. 1, (2012): 9-34.
Kant, Immanuel. Crítica da razão pura, trad. Alexandre F. Morujão e Manuela P. dos Santos. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1989.
Kant, Immanuel. Prolegómenos a Toda Metafísica Futura, trad. de A. Morão. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1988.
Klemme, Heiner. Kants Philosophie des Subjekts. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.
Lebrun, Gérard. “A aporética da coisa em si.” In Sobre Kant, 51-58. São Paulo: Iluminuras - Edusp, 1993.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge, trans. Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: University Press, 2000.
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Thöle, Bernhard. Kant und das Problem der Gesetzmassigkeit der Natur. Berlin: Walter de Guyter, 1997.
Vleeschauwer, H. J. La Déduction Transcendantale dans l` Oeuvre de Kant, 3 vol ., New York/ London: Garland Publishing, 1976.
Wolfgang, Carl. “Kant’s first drafts of the deduction of the categories”. In Kant`s Transcendental Deductions: Three Critiques and the Opus postumum. Org. Eckart Forster, 3-20. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
