Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices

Reconsidering Mach in the Light of the Interplay of Practices

Tags:

• history,
• cognitive approach,
• philosophy of mathematics,
• philosophy of science,
• pragmatism

Notes:

• Baç, Murat. “Structure versus process: Mach, Hertz, and the normative aspect of science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31, no. 1 (2000): 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008334407481
  Banks, Erich. C. “The philosophical roots of Ernst Mach’s economy of thought.” Synthese 139, no. 1 (2004): 23-53. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000021306. 66850 .a3
  Buchwald, Jed Z. Ed. Scientific Practice: Theories and Stories of Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  Dion, Sonia M. “Pierre Duhem and the inconsistency between instrumentalism and natural classification.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, no. 1 (2013): 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.001
  Cohen, Robert. S. “Ernst Mach: Physics, Perception and the Philosophy of Science.” Synthese 18 (1968): 132-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1462-4_8
  Collins, Harry M. “‘Son of seven sexes’, The Social Destruction of a Physical Phenomenon”, Social Studies of Science, 11, no. 1 (1981): 33–62, doi: 10.1177/030631278101100103
  de Paz, María. Henri Poincaré: Del Convencionalismo a la Gravitación. London: College Publications, 2016.
  de Paz, María. “Book review of Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices, by José Ferreirós.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 68, no. 271 (2018): 406-408, https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx036 (online first, 2017)
  Gaber, David and Dirk Schlimm, “Basic mathematical cognition”, WIREs Cognitive Science, 6, no. 4 (2015): 355–369, doi: 10.1002/wcs.1351
  Gori, Pietro. “Nietzsche as Phenomenalist?” In Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie: Hintergründe, Wirkungen und Aktualität edited by Helmut Heit, Günter Abel and Marco Brusotti, 345-356. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012.
  Gori, Pietro. “What Does It Mean to Orient Oneself in Science? On Ernst Mach’s Pragmatic Epistemology.” In Ernst Mach: Life, Work and Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook) edited by Friedrich Stadler. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018-forthcoming.
  Ferreirós, José. Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
  Hacking, Ian. Representing and Intervening, Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  Haller, Rudolph. “Conventionalism and its Impact on Logical Empiricism.” Philosophia Scientiae 3, no. 2 (1998-1999): 95-108.
  Hiebert, Erwin N. “Mach’s Philosophical Use of History.” In Historical & Philosophical Perspectives on Science, edited by Roger Stuewer, 184-213. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970.
  Johnston, William M. The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, 1848-1938. Berkeley: University of Califorina Press, 1983.
  Lenin, Vladimir I. Materialism and Empirio-Criticism. Translated by Abraham Fineberg. Moscow: Progres Publishers, 1908 [1972].
  Mach, Ernst. History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy.Translated by P. E. B. Jourdain. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Co, 1872 [1911].
  Mach, Ernst. Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwickelung historisch-kritisch Dargestellt. Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1883 [1901].
  Mach, Ernst. The Analysis of Sensations. Translated by C. M. Williams. Chicago and London: The Open Court Publishing Co, 1886 [1914].
  Mach, Ernst. Principles of the Theory of Heat. Trnsalted by T. J. McCormack. Dodrecht/Boston: Reidel, 1896 [1986].
  Mach, Ernst. Knowledge and Error. Translated by T. J. McCormack and P. Foulkes. Dordrecth/Boston: Dordrecht-Reidel publishing company, 1905 [1976].
  Marcos, Alfredo. Pierre Duhem. La filosofía de la ciencia en sus orígenes. Barcelona: PPU, 1988.
  Paty, Michel. “Mach et Duhem, l’épistémologie des savants-philosophes.” In Épistémologie et matérialisme edited by Olivier Bloch, 177-218. Paris: Klinsiek, 1986.
  Pickering, Andrew. “Against Correspondence: A Constructivist View of Experiment and the Real”, in Proceedings of PSA 1986, eds. A. Fine and P. Machamer (Pittsburgh: Philosophy of Science Association), vol. 2 (1987): 196–206.
  Pojman, Paul. “Ernst Mach”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/ernst-mach/>.
  Rouse, Joseph. How Scientific Practices Matter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
  Schnädelbach, Herbert. Philosophie in Deutschland 1831-1933, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, 1983
  Schramm, Alfred. “Metaphysics, Carnap’s Remedy and Machs’s Science.” Philosophia Scientiae 3, no. 2 (1998-1999): 109-120.
  Soler, Léna, Sjoerd Zwart, Michael Lynch and Vincent Israel-Jost. Science After the Practice Turn in Philosophy, History, and the Social Studies of Science. New York and London: Routledge, 2014.