The Zoon Politikon: Medieval Aristotelian Interpretations
António Rocha Martins, “The Zoon Politikon: Medieval Aristotelian Interpretations,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 3 (2019): 1539–74, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1539.
António Rocha Martins, “The Zoon Politikon: Medieval Aristotelian Interpretations,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75, no. 3 (2019): 1539–74, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1539.
Type | Journal Article |
---|---|
Author | António Rocha Martins |
Rights | © 2019 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2019 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
Volume | 75 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 1539-1574 |
Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
ISSN | 0870-5283 |
Date | 2019 |
DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2019_75_3_1539 |
Language | English |
Abstract | The aim of the present paper is to recall, in light of the newest research (conducted in the last decades of the twentieth century), the originality and the innovation of Albert the Great’s, Thomas Aquinas’ and Giles of Rome’s interpretations of the definition of man as a “political animal”, in the frame of the rediscovery of Aristotle by the Latin West, the historic-philosophic outlines of which are still not entirely transparent. Is it legitimate to state that through this school of thought in the Late Middle Ages there was a transformation of the traditional subject of politics, even if effacing the corruption that originates from human nature itself? In addition, is it true that the well-known position of “transformation” of the political animal into a social animal, while being suggestive and exact, omits the character of both novelty and rupture when juxtaposed to the usual framework at the time? My considerations will be divided into five parts. First, I will convey a short sketch of Aristotle’s notion of man as a political animal. In the second part, I will look at the political implications of the conception of power stemming from the original sin, a prevailing notion in the Latin Middle Ages and one that very much endured until the knowledge of the peripatetic political approach resurfaced. In the last three parts, I will attempt to explore the interpretations framed in the works of Albert the Great (III), Thomas Aquinas (IV) and Giles of Rome (V). And finally, in my concluding remarks, I will attempt to emphasize the problematic core condensed in the concepts which preside over the present paper. |
Date Added | 27/10/2019, 19:52:55 |
Modified | 27/10/2019, 20:05:31 |
Albert the Great, De animalibus libri XXVI, ed. H. Stadler, Beiträge zur Geschicthe der Philosophie des Mittelalters, vols. 15-16. Münster: Aschendorffche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1916.
Albert the Great, Super Ethica, ed. W. Kübel, Opera Omnia, XIV/1-2. Cologne: Aschendorff, 1968-72 and 1987.
Albert the Great, Ethicorum Libri X, ed. A. Borgnet, Opera Omnia, vol. VII, Paris, Vivès, 1891.
Albert the Great, Politicorum Libri VIII, ed. A. Borgnet, Opera Omnia, vol.VIII, Paris, Vivès, 1891.
Anzulewicz, Henryk. “O entendimento da natureza em Alberto Magno”, in Pensar a Natureza. Problemas e respostas na Idade Média (séculos IX-XIV), ed. J. F Meirinhos, et al. Porto, 2011: 117-140
Arendt, H. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University Press, 1958.
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. W. D. Ross, ed. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, vol. 2, 1985.
Aristotle, Politics, trans. Benjamin Jowett, ed. Jonathan Barnes, in The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation, Princeton: Princeton University Press, vol. 2, 1985.
Augustine, De Civitate Dei libri XX, ed. B. Dombart, A. Kalb, 2 vols. Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina, 47-48. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.
Bertelloni, Francisco. “El lugar de la política dentro de la tripartición de la philosophia practica antes de la recepción medieval de la Política de Aristoteles», Veritas 43, no 3 (1998): 563-576.
Blythe, James M. Ideal Government and the Mixed Constitution in the Middle Ages. Princeton, 1992.
Brams, Jozef. “The Revised Version of Grosseteste’s Translation of the Nicomachean Ethics”, Bulletin de philosophie médiévale, 36 (1994): 45-55.
Brams, Jozef. “The Latin Aristotle and the Medieval Latin Commentaries”, Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 39 (1997): 9-22.
Briguglia, Gianluca. “Si stetissent primi parentes: elementi di un modello politico tra filosofia ed esegesi”, AHDLMA, 73 (2006): 43-62.
Burnett, Charles. “Translating from Arabic into Latin in the Middle Ages: Theory, Practice and Criticism”, in S. G. Lofts and P. W. Rosemann, eds. Éditer, traduire, interpréter. Essais de méthodologie philosophique. Louvain-la-Neuve, 1997, 55-78.
Canning, Joseph. A History of Medieval Political Thought, 300-1450. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.
Celano, Anthony J. “The earliest medieval Latin commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics”, in Idem, Aristoteles’s Ethics and Medieval Philosophy. Moral Goodness and Practical Wisdom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016, 75-99.
Celano, Anthony J. “Happiness, prudence and moral reasoning in the later works of Albert the Great, in Idem, Aristoteles’s Ethics and Medieval Philosophy. Moral Goodness and Practical Wisdom. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2016, 131-169.
Colas, Dominique. Le Glaive et le Fléau. Généalogie du fanatisme et de la société civile. Paris: Bernard Grasset, 1992.
Curbelié, Philippe. La justice dans La Cité de Dieu. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 2004.
Daguet, Françoise. Du Politique chez Thomas D’Aquin. Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin, 2015.
Dunbabin, J. “The Two Commentaries of Albertus Magnus on the Nicomachean Ethics”, Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale, 30 (1963): 232-250.
Finnis, John. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Fioravanti, Gianfranco. “Servi, rustici, barbari: interpretacioni medievali della Politica aristotélica”, Annali della Scuola Normale di Pisa, serie III, 11 (1981), 399-429.
Flüeler, C. Rezeption und Interpretation der Aristotelischen Politica im späten Mittelalter, 2 vols. Bochumer Studien zur Philosophie, 19. Amsterdam: Grüner, 1992.
Gianfranco, Fioravanti. “La Politica aristotelica nel Medioevo: linee di una ricezione”. Rivista de Storia della Filosofia, 52 (1997): 17-29.
Giles of Rome [Aegidius Romanus], De regimine principum libri III, ed. H. Samaritanius, Romae, 1607 (reprint Aalen, 1967).
Habermas, J. Theorie und Praxis, Sozialphilosopische Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1963.
Hallberg, Peter, and Björn Wittrock, “From Koinonìa Politikè to Societas Civilis: Birth, Disappearance and First Renaissance of the Concept”, in The Languages of Civil Society, ed. Peter Wagner, New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2006.
Hamesse, Jacqueline. Les ‘Auctoritates Aristotelis’. Un florilège médiéval. Étude historique et édition critique. Louvain, 1974.
Heyking, John von. Augustine and politics as longing in the world. Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 2001.
Höpfl, Harro M. “Scholaticism in Quentin Skinner’s Foundations”, in Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, ed. Annabel Brett and James Tully with Holly Hamilton-Bleakley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 113-129.
Lagarde, Georges de. La Naissance de l’Esprit Laïque au déclin du Moyen Age. Le ‘Defensor Pacis’, vol. 3, Louvain-Paris, 1970.
Lambertini, Roberto. “The Prince in the Mirror of Philosophy. Uses of Aristotle in Giles of Rome’s de Regimine Principium”, in Moral and Political Philosophies in the Middle Ages, Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Medieval Philosophy Ottawa, 17-22 August 1992, ed. B. Carlos Bazán et alii, New York/Ottawa/Toronto, 1995: 1522-1534.
Lambertini, Roberto. “Philosophus videtur tangere tres rationes. Egidio Rommano lettore ed interprete della ‘Politica’ nel terzo libro del De regimine principum”, in Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale, I, 1 (1990): 277-325.
Lanza, Lidia. “La Politica di Aristotele e il De regimine principium di Egidio Romano”, in Medioevo e Rinascimento XV/ns. XII (2001): 19-75.
Luscombe, David. “Ethics in the Early Thirteenth Century”, in Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption in lateinischen Mittelater: Von Richardus Rufus bis zu Franciscus de Mayronis, ed. Ludger Honnefelder et al., Subsidia Albertina 1 (Münster, 2005): 657-68.
Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias. “The Discovery of a Normative Theory of Justice in Medieval Philosophy: On the Reception and Further Development of Aristotle´s Theory of Justice by St. Thomas Aquinas”, Medieval Philosophy and Theology 9 (2000): 1-14.
Markus, R. A. Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Müller, J. “Felicitas civilis und felicitas contemplativa: Zur Verhältnisbestimung der beiden aristotelischen Glüksformen in den Ethikkommentaren des Albertus Magnus”, in L. Honnefelder, H. Möhle, S. Bullido del Barrio (ed.), Via Alberti, Texte, Quellen – Interpretationen (Subsidia Albertina II). Münster 2009: 295-324.
Nederman, Cary J. “Aristotelianism and the Origins of ‘Political Science’ in the Twelfth Century”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 52 (1991): 179-194.
Nederman, Cary J. “Aristotle as authority: alternative Aristotelian sources of late medieval political theory”, History of European Ideas, vol. 8, no 1 (1987): 31-44.
Riedel, Manfred. Metaphysik und Metapolitik. Studien zu Aristoteles und zur politische Sprache der neuzeitlichen Philosophie. Frankfurt-am-Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.
Rubinstein, Nicolai. “The History of the Word Politicus in Early-Modern Europe”, in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. Anthony Pagden. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987: 41-56.
Schmidt, James. “A Raven with a Halo: The Translation of Aristotle’s Politics”, History of Political Thought, 7 (1986): 295-319.
Sternberger, Dolf. “Politics in language: twelve notes on the history of words and meanings”, in Maurice Cranston et Peter Mair, eds. Language and politics/Language et politique. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1982: 25-39.
Rosier-Catach, Irène. “Civilitas. De la Famile à L’Empire Universel”, in Mots Médiévaux Offerts à Ruedi Imbachi, ed. I. Atucha et alii. Porto, 2011: 163-174.
Thomas Aquinas, Sententia libri Politicorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita, vol. 48. Rome: ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1971.
Thomas Aquinas, Sententia libri Ethicorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita, vols. 47: 1-2. Rome: ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1969.
Thomas Aquinas, De Regno ad Regem Cypri. Ed. R.-A. Gauthier, Ed. Leonina 42, Rome, 1979: 449-471.
Thomas Aquinas, Prima secunda Summae theologiae, qq. 90-105. Editio Leonina, vol. 6, Rome, 1892.
Valenzuela, Pia. “Between Scylla and Charybdis. Aquinas’s Political Thought and His Notion of Natural Law and Ius Gentium”, in International Law and Religion. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Martti Koskenniemi, Mónica García-Salmones Rovira, and Paolo Amorosa. Oxford University Press, 2017: 43-63.