Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

¿Es posible Dios en el naturalismo de Merleau-Ponty? Discusiones fenomenológicas

¿Es posible Dios en el naturalismo de Merleau-Ponty? Discusiones fenomenológicas

Ricardo Mejía Fernández, “¿Es posible Dios en el naturalismo de Merleau-Ponty? Discusiones fenomenológicas,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76, no. 2–3 (2020): 621–38, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_2_0621.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

137620621

Disponível apenas on-line

  • ¿Es posible Dios en el naturalismo de Merleau-Ponty? Discusiones fenomenológicas

    Type Journal Article
    Author Ricardo Mejía Fernández
    Rights © 2020 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    Volume 76
    Issue 2-3
    Pages 621-638
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    ISSN 0870-5283
    Date 2020
    Extra Is God Possible in Merleau-Ponty Naturalism? Phenomenological Discussions
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2020_76_2_0621
    Language Spanish
    Abstract In order to understand the phenomenological possibility of God, or any other topic of Merleau-Ponty’s thought, we should first investigate his own naturalism. In fact, this ideological framework went through all his phenomenological work and his university teaching dedication. Our goal, which reinforces the originality of this paper, is to link the theme of God with the naturalism of Merleau-Ponty’s lectures at the Collège de France. A strong defense of an evolving and ontological Nature grasped his maturity courses about Nature, where God played second fiddle. Taking seriously this problem, the only way out for God in this author is neither that of an idea nor the God as the total otherness of mature Schelling. It should be, on the contrary, a God who can be lived carnally in some way as an extension of the biological and lived linkages of the body itself. This enormous intellectual effort constituted an important preparation to interpret contemporary theophenomenologies in French thought.
    Date Added 7/28/2020, 10:07:32 PM
    Modified 7/29/2020, 10:34:28 AM

    Tags:

    • God,
    • Merleau-Ponty,
    • naturalism,
    • phenomenology,
    • science,
    • theophenomenology

    Notes:

    • Barbaras, Renaud. “Merleau-Ponty et la Nature.” Chiasmi International. From Nature to Ontology 2 (2000): 47-61.
      Basilio Cladakis, Maximiliano. “Merleau-Ponty y la ontología de la naturaleza: intercorporalidad, negatividad, dialéctica.” Diánoia 61 (2016): 83-108.
      Brunschvicg, L. Nature et liberté. Paris: Flammarion, 1921.
      Brunschvicg, L. L’Expérience humaine et la causalité physique. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1922.
      Chá Larrieu, Alberto. Elementos de epistemología. Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce, 2002.
      Depraz, Natalie y Mauriac, François. “Théo-phénoménologie I: l’amour – Jean-Luc Marion et Christos Yannaras.” Revue de metaphysique et de morale 2, no. 74 (2012): 247-277. doi: https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.122.0247.
      De Saint-Aubert, Emmanuel. “’L’incarnation change tout’ Merleau-Ponty critique de la ‘théologie explicative’,” Transversalités 112 (2009): 147-186. doi: 10.3917/trans.112.0147. 
      Dupond, Pascal. Le vocabulaire de Merleau-Ponty. Paris: Ellipses, 2001.
      Dupond, Pascal. “Merleau-Ponty.” En Le vocabulaire des philosophes. La philosophie contemporaine (XXe siècle), editado por Jean-Pierre Zarader, 445-496. Paris: Ellipses, 2016.
      Giere, Ronald N. “Modest evolutionary naturalism.” En Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Editado por Chienkuo Michael Mi y Ruey-lin Chen (Amsterdam; Rodopi, 2007).
      Goldstein, Kurt. Théorie de l’organisme, Paris: Gallimard, 1952.
      Habermas, Jürgen. Das Absolute und die Geschichte: Von der Zwiespältigkeit in Schellings. Bonn: Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhems-Universität, 1954.
      Hempel, Carl. Filosofia de la ciencia natural. Madrid: Alianza, 1973.
      Husserl, Edmund. Formale und Transzendentale Logik: Versuch einer Kritik der Logischen Vernunft [Hua XVI]. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1929.
      Husserl, Edmund. Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen [Hua II]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950.
      Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie [Hua III.1-2/IV]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952/1988. 
      Labelle, Gilles. “Merleau-Ponty et le christianisme.” Laval théologique et philosophique 58, no. 2 (2002): 317-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/000364ar.
      López Sáez, Mª del Carmen. “Naturaleza y carne del mundo. Aportaciones de Merleau-Ponty a la ecofenomenología.” Ludus Vitalis 14, no. 26 (2006): 171-186.
      Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard, 1945.
      Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Résumés de Cours, Collège de France, 1952-1960. Paris: Gallimard, 1968.
      Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Filosofía y lenguaje. Collège de France. 1952-1960, Buenos Aires: Proteo, 1969.
      Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. La Nature. Notes, Cours du Collège de France (1957-1960). Editado por Dominique Séglard. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1995.
      Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Nature: Course notes from the Collège de France (1957-1960). Traducción de Robert Villier. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2003.
      Toadvine, Ted. Merleau-Ponty’s Philosophy of Nature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2009.
      Varela, Francisco, Thompson, Evan y Rosch, Eleanor. L’inscription corporelle de l’esprit: Sciences cognitives et expérience humaine. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1993.
      Weischedel, W. Der Gott der Philosophen. Gundlegung einer philosophischen Theologie im Zeitalter des Nihilismus. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1983.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa