Gaetano Chiurazzi, “Obra de arte e verdade: Sobre a inversão de Heidegger da estética de Platão,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 78, no. 3 (2022): 1049–62, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2022_78_3_1049.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Gaetano Chiurazzi |
| Rights | © 2022 by Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1049-1062 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X |
| Date | 2022 |
| Extra | Work of Art and Truth: On Heidegger’s Inversion of Plato’s Aesthetics |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2022_78_3_1049 |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Abstract | According to the doctrine set out in Book X of the Republic, art is for Plato three degrees far from truth. This doctrine is based on the representative character of art: in his productions, the artist takes sensible things and not the ideas as his model, and ignores the use of the objects that the craftsman produces. In the essay The Origin of the Work of Art, Heidegger completely reverses this Platonic hierarchy. The essay seems to be an indirect response to Plato, as it discusses exactly the distinctions Plato draws, between natural object (the idea, which is “by nature”), object of use and work of art. The work of art – even when it imitates an object of use, as in the case of van Gogh’s painting of a pair of shoes – is for Heidegger the “setting-itself-to-work of truth”, because it shows the primarily ontological character of every work: its fabrication, that is, its historical being. The truth of the work of art lies in its historical character, and the work of art is the happening of truth because, more than any other object, its essence consists precisely in showing the temporal character as the essence of every object, even the natural ones. |
| Date Added | 8/11/2022, 9:35:23 PM |
| Modified | 8/11/2022, 10:00:21 PM |
Aubry Gwenaëlle. Dieu sans la puissance : Dunamis et energeia chez Aristote et chez Plotin. Paris: Vrin, 2006.
Bataille George. Lascaux ou la naissance de l’art. In Œuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard, 1979.
Chiurazzi, Gaetano. Teorias del juício. Trad. José Catalayud. Madrid-Ciudad del México: Plaza y Valdés, 2008.
Chiurazzi Gaetano. A expêriencia da verdade. Trad. Íris Fátima da Silva Uribe e Luis Uribe Miranda. São Paulo: Paco Editorial, 2019.
Chiurazzi Gaetano. Dynamis. Ontología de lo inconmensurável. Trad. Paloma Oñate. Sevilla: Fenix Editora, 2022.
Deacon Terrence W. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York – London: Norton & Company, 2011.
Deleuze Gilles. “Platon et le simulacre”, in Logique du sens. Paris: Minuit, 1969.
Duarte, Irene Borges. Arte e Técnica em Heidegger. Rio de Janeiro: Via Verita, 2019.
Fronterotta Francesco. “Pensare la differenza. Statuto dell’essere e definizione del diverso nel Sofista di Platone”. In Platone e l’ontologia. Il Parmenide e il Sofista, organizado por M. Bianchetti e E.S. Storace. Milão: AlboVersorio, 2004.
Gadamer Hans-Georg. Hermeneutik I. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr, 1990.
Heidegger Martin. Der Ursprung des Kunstwerkes. In Holzwege (Gesamtasugabe vol. 5). Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1977.
Heidegger Martin. A Origem da Obra de Arte. Edição Bilingue, trad. Idalina Azevedo e Manuel Antonio de Castro. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2010.
Heidegger Martin. Ser e Tempo. Trad. Fausto Castilho. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2012.
Klein Jakob. Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra. Trad. de E. Brann. Cambridge, Mass., e London, England: MIT Press, 1968.
Platão. A República de Platão. Traducão de J. Guinsburg. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2006.
Simondon Gilbert. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble: Éditions Jerôme Million, 2013.
