Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Two Problems of Ontology of States of Affairs: Negative States of Affairs and the Slingshot Argument

Two Problems of Ontology of States of Affairs: Negative States of Affairs and the Slingshot Argument

Tomasz Kąkol, “Two Problems of Ontology of States of Affairs: Negative States of Affairs and the Slingshot Argument,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 80, no. 4 (2024): 1123–32, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2024_80_4_1123.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

128041123

Disponível apenas on-line

  • Two Problems of Ontology of States of Affairs: Negative States of Affairs and the Slingshot Argument

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Tomasz Kąkol
    Abstract In this article I briefly discuss two problems of ontology of states of affairs: the issue of negative states of affairs and the so-called slingshot argument. In particular, I consider several objections against negative states of affairs, including this one: if one accepts the existence of negative states of affairs, why not accept the existence of conjunctive states of affairs (or, alternatively, Shefferian ones, or even binegative ones), which results, it seems, in the acceptance of the existence of states of affairs of any logical form. I argue that regardless of this doubt, at least some negative sentences have (non-trivial) ontological correlates. As for the slingshot argument, I argue that it is not the implicated Principle of Extensionality that is at fault, but the principle of the identity of the correlates of logically equivalent sentences (often called ‘Wittgenstein’s Principle’), which is simply false since ‘2+2=4’ and ‘8-5=3’ are just logically equivalent.
    Date 2024
    Language English
    Rights © 2024 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Volume 80
    Pages 1123-1132
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2024_80_4_1123
    Issue 4
    Date Added 12/6/2024, 8:33:06 PM
    Modified 12/6/2024, 10:21:59 PM

    Tags:

    • metaphysics, negation, ontology, slingshot argument, states of affairs.

    Notes:

    • Biłat, Andrzej. „Filozoficzne podstawy logiki sytuacji”. In Aporie ontologii sytuacji, edited by Andrzej Biłat, 95-153. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2009

      Chisholm, Roderick. Person and Object. A Metaphysical Study. La Salle: Open Court, 1979, doi: 10.4324/9781315830223

      Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art. An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic and Theory of Literature. Translated by G. G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973

      Ingarden, Roman. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Vol. II. Translated by A. Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2016, doi: 10.3726/978-3-653-02504-0

      Kripke, Saul. “Identity and Necessity”. In Identity and Individuation, edited by Milton Munitz, 135-164. New York: New York University Press, 1971, doi: 10.2307/2025325

      Neale, Stephen. Facing Facts. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001

      Piwowarczyk, Marek. Podmiot i własności. Analiza podstawowej struktury przedmiotu [Subject and Properties. The Analysis of Fundamental Structure of Object]. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2015

      Wójtowicz, Anna. „Problemy ontologii sytuacji”. In Aporie ontologii sytuacji, edited by Andrzej Biłat, 13-35. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2009

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa