Everything You Think about Equivocation Is False

Everything You Think about Equivocation Is False

Tags:

• philosophy of language
• ambiguity
• equivocation
• fallacies
• informal logic

Notes:

• Burge, Tyler. “Individualism and the Mental.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy: Studies in Metaphysics, edited by P. French, T. Uehling, Jr., and H. Wettstein, 73-122. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x

  Burge, Tyler. “Other Bodies.” In Thought and Object, edited by A. Woodfield, 97-120. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.

  Chalmers, David. “The Nature of Narrow Content.” Philosophical Issues 13 (2003): 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1533-6077.00004

  Dowden, Bradley. “Fallacies.” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed February 2023.

  Gerken, Mikkel. “Conceptual Equivocation and Warrant by Reasoning.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2011): 381-400. 10.1080/00048402.2010.488267

  Gerken, Mikkel. “Conceptual Equivocation and Epistemic Relevance.” Dialectica 63 (2009): 117-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2008.01169.x

  Hansen, Hans. “Fallacies.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2020.

  Jackson, Frank. “Narrow Content and Representation, or Twin Earth Revisited.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 77 (2003): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3219741

  Kaplan, David. “Words.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 64 (1990): 93-119. 10.1093/aristoteliansupp/64.1.93

  Kriegel, Uriah. “Real Narrow Content.” Mind and Language 23 (2008): 305–28. 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00345.x

  Kripke, Saul. “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Meaning and Use, edited by A. Margalit. 239-83. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 239-83. Reprinted in Propositions and Attitudes, edited by N. Salmon and S. Soames, 102-48. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4104-4_20

  Kripke, Saul. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.

  Loar, Brian. “Social Content and Psychological Content.” In Contents of Thought, edited by R. Grimm and D. Merrill. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199673353.003.0010

  Stoneham, Tom. “On Equivocation.” Philosophy 78, no. 4 (2003): 515-19. 10.1017/s0031819103000469

  Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani, and John Hawthorne. Narrow Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.001.0001