Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Say It, But Don’t Mean It

Say It, But Don’t Mean It

Daniel Nolan, “Say It, But Don’t Mean It,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 81, no. 4 (2025): 1047–82, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2025_81_4_1047.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

128141047

Disponível apenas on-line

  • Say It, But Don’t Mean It

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Daniel Nolan
    Abstract Call “fictional assertions” sentences that look or sound like assertions, but which are produced as parts of fictions, or in talk engaged with fictions. In contrast to standard views about these sentences, this paper argues that these fictional assertions are genuinely assertions, and have the same semantics that their literal counterparts have. The difference lies in the pragmatics of communication, rather than in content or force.
    Date 2025
    Library Catalog 401; 401.43; 401.45; 160; 401.41
    License © 2026 by Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Volume 81
    Publisher Axioma - Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia
    Section Philosophy of Language: New Frontiers in Meaning and Use
    Pages 1047-1082
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2025_81_4_1047
    Issue 4
    Journal Abbr RPF
    ISSN 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X
    Date Added 1/31/2026, 7:41:58 PM
    Modified 1/31/2026, 9:22:15 PM

    Tags:

    • fiction
    • assertion
    • philosophy of language
    • speech acts
    • truth in fiction

    Notes:

    • Beardsley, Monroe. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1958.

      Berto, Francesco. “Modal Meinongianism and Fiction: The Best of Three Worlds.” Philosophical Studies 152 (2011): 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-009-9479-2

      Currie, Greg. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.

      Davidson, Donald. “Moods and Performances.” In Meaning and Use, edited by Avishai Margalit, 9–20. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.

      Davidson, Donald. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, edited by Ernie Lepore, 433–446. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

      Davies, David. “Fictive Utterance and the Fictionality of Narratives and Works.” British Journal of Aesthetics 55 no. 1 (2015): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayu061

      Dummett, Michael. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth, 1973.

      Eagle, Antony. “Telling Tales.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 107 (2007): 125-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2007.00215.x

      Egan, Andy. “Pretense for the Complete Idiom.” Nous 42 (2008): 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2008.00686.x

      Eklund, Matti. “Fictionalism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman, Spring 2024 edition. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, 2024. URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/fictionalism/>

      Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel. “Fiction-Making as Gricean Illocutionary Type.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 no.2 (2007): 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594x.2007.00250.x.

      Goodman, Nelson. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1978.

      Grice, Paul. “Utterer’s Meaning and Intention.” Philosophical Review 78 No. 2 (1969): 147–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179

      Hare, Richard M. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon, 1952.

      Joyce, Richard. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

      Joyce, Richard. “Moral Fictionalism.” In Fictionalism in Metaphysics, edited by Mark E. Kalderon, 287–313. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199282180.003.0010

      Kölbel, Max. “Literal Force: A Defence of Conventional Assertion.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Language, edited by Sarah Sawyer, 108–137. London: Palgrave-MacMillan. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248588_7

      Kripke, Saul. Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.001.0001

      Lewis, David. “Truth in Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1978): 37–46.

      Parsons, Josh. “Command and Consequence.” Philosophical Studies 164 No. 1 (2013): 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0094-x

      Predelli, Stefano. Fictional Discourse: A Radical Fictionalist Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854128.001.0001

      Searle, John. “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse.” New Literary History 6 No. 2 (1975): 319–332.

      van Fraassen, Bas C. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980.

      van Inwagen, Peter. “Creatures of Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14 no. 4 (1977): 299–308.

      Walton, Kendall. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

      Walton, Kendall. “Metaphor and Prop-Oriented Make-Believe.” European Journal of Philosophy 1 (1993): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1993.tb00023.x

      Walton, Kendall. “Fictionality and Imagination Reconsidered.” In From Fictionalism to Realism, edited by Carola Barbero, Maurizio Ferraris and Alberto Voltolini (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2013)

      Williamson, Timothy. “Knowing and Asserting.” The Philosophical Review 105 no. 4 (1996): 489–523. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998423.

      Yablo, Stephen. “A Paradox of Existence.” In Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzle of Existence, edited by Thomas Hofweber and Anthony Everett, 275–312. Stanford: CSLI Press, 2000.

      Yablo, Stephen. “Go Figure: A Path Through Fictionalism.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (2001): 72–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4975.00040

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa