Rizoma e pluralidade ontológica no Livro do desassossego
Arturo Diaz, “Rizoma e pluralidade ontológica no Livro do desassossego,” Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades 25, no. 1–2 (2021): 217–34, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPH/2021_25_1_217.
Arturo Diaz, “Rizoma e pluralidade ontológica no Livro do desassossego,” Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades 25, no. 1–2 (2021): 217–34, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPH/2021_25_1_217.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Arturo Diaz |
| Rights | © 2021 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 217-234 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades |
| ISSN | 0874-0321 |
| Date | 2021 |
| Extra | Rhizome and Ontological Plurality in the “Livro do desassossego” |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPH/2021_25_1_217 |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Abstract | This short essay on The book of disquiet, from a Deleuzian’s reading, focuses on two essential topics. Firstly, from the point of view of its structural composition, The book of disquiet is post-modern rhizome, for it consists of fragments that are connected to each other, but differing among themselves. This fragmentary composition expresses, in its turn, another ontological split in the plural and decentred personality of Fernando Pessoa that is generated by the movement of internal Difference. This postmodern approach of The book of disquiet proceeds from the untimely genius of its author, who knew how to assimilate certain traditions of the nineteenth century; to dare to try new possibilities in modernism with Orpheus; and to open new clearings of a time to come, which represents our contemporary post-modern. In the untimely dimension of this postmodern future, we are interested in highlighting certain signs and symptoms from the movement of the ontological Difference – a pure differentiating intensity – as it is done in our reading of the drama in interactive souls. Hence the ideal set of differences, static drama and the heteronymic rhizome in the transcendental field of thought and creation. This is an ontological set in which if there is space for chance, random and becoming-other the fractal breakup of subjectivity then operates. In this ideal set of differences that shapes the heteronymic dramaturgy, the virtual multiplicities (affects, perceptions or visions) update themselves on the fluid consciousness of the singularity that is Bernardo Soares and they are part of the plan of expression. |
| Date Added | 1/20/2022, 3:06:58 PM |
| Modified | 1/20/2022, 3:27:57 PM |
Bartholomew, Ryan, “Machines and ‘Empty and oceanic thought’: Fernando Pessoas doing and being of the self’,” Questioning the Oneness of Philosophy. 4th Workshop of the Project Experimentation and Dissidence. Universidade de Lisboa: Edited by José Miranda Justo, Elisabete Sousa, Fernando Silva.
Bateson, F. Gregory. Vers une écologie de l’esprit. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997.
Bernardo Soares, Livro do desassossego, 1a Edição de Richard Zenith. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 1998.
Chevitarese, L., “As ‘Razões’ da Pós-modernidade”, Análogos, Anais da I SAF-PUC. Rio de Janeiro: Booklink, 2001.
Deleuze, Gilles, Différence et Répétition. Paris: PUF, 1997.
Deleuze, Gilles e Félix Guattari, Mille Plateaux. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1994.
Deleuze, Gilles e Félix Guattari, Rizoma, trad. Rafael Godinho. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 2006.
Eiras, Pedro, Esquecer Fausto, A fragmentação do sujeito em Raul Brandão, Fernando Pessoa, Herberto Helder e Maria Gabriela Llansol. Porto: Campo das Letras, 2005.
Fernando Pessoa, Teoria da heteronímia, Edição de Fernando Cabral Martins e Richard Zenith. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 2012.
Fernando Pessoa, Sobre Orpheu e o sensacionismo, Edição de Fernando Cabral Martins e Richard Zenith. Lisboa: Assírio & Alvim, 2015.
Gil, José. Fernando Pessoa ou a Metafísica das Sensações. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água, 1987.
Gil, José. O Espaço Interior. Lisboa: Presença, 1994.
Gil, José. Diferença e Negação na Poesia de Fernando Pessoa. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água, 1999.
Gil, José. “Deleuze: Esthétique, littérature, ontologie”, Deleuze et les écrivains. Littérature etphilosophie, dir. de Bruno Gelas et Hervé Micolet. Nantes: Éditions Cécile Defaut, 2007.
Gil, José. O devir-eu de Fernando Pessoa. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água Editores, 2010.
Gil, José. Cansaço, Tédio, Desassossego. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água Editores, 2013.
Harvey, David. Condição pós-moderna, Uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança Cultural. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 1992.
Lopes, Teresa Rita. Fernando Pessoa et le Drame Symbolista: Héritage et Création. Paris: Fondation Caloustre Gulbenkian, Centre Culturel Portugais, 1985.
Lourenço, Eduardo. Fernando Rei da nossa Baviera. Lisboa: INCM, 1993.
Lourenço, Eduardo. Pessoa revisitado. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2003.
Lourenço, Eduardo. O lugar do Anjo. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2004.
Sena, Jorge de. Fernando Pessoa & C.aHeterónima, Estudos coligidos 1940-1978, Vol. I. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1982.