Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Language or Underlying Mechanism? Investigating Single versus Joint Evaluations for Causal Attributions

Language or Underlying Mechanism? Investigating Single versus Joint Evaluations for Causal Attributions

Justin Sytsma, “Language or Underlying Mechanism? Investigating Single versus Joint Evaluations for Causal Attributions,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 81, no. 4 (2025): 1099–132, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2025_81_4_1099.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

128141099

Disponível apenas on-line

  • Language or Underlying Mechanism? Investigating Single versus Joint Evaluations for Causal Attributions

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Justin Sytsma
    Abstract Recent research in experimental philosophy indicates that norms matter for the causal attributions that people offer and endorse, at least in English, although there is a good deal of debate concerning why they matter. This includes disagreements about the nature of the question. In line with x-phi’s descriptive program, some researchers have focused on detailing how people use the relevant bits of language. By contrast, researchers working within x-phi’s cognitive program have offered proposals about the underlying mechanisms by which the concept of causation gets expressed in that language. Most prominently the latter includes counterfactual accounts, which explain the impact on norms on causal attributions in terms of the salience of counterfactuals. In this paper, I reconsider the evidence offered by Icard et al. (2017) in favor of a counterfactual explanation, illustrating how subtle differences in the linguistic context provided by the researchers can influence participants responses in important ways. Specifically, I report a large study (N=3678) in which I vary whether participants are asked a question about just one of the two agents involved in the scenarios tested by Icard et al. (single evaluations) or about both agents (joint evaluations). The results suggest two evaluation effects: there is a general trend for the causal ratings in these cases to be lower when using single evaluations than when using joint evaluations, and this difference is larger when the agent asked about violates an injunctive norm. I argue that how we think about these effects has important implications for the plausibility of counterfactual accounts.
    Date 2025
    Library Catalog 401; 401.43; 401.45; 160; 401.41
    License © 2026 by Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Volume 81
    Publisher Axioma - Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia
    Section Philosophy of Language: New Frontiers in Meaning and Use
    Pages 1099-1132
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2025_81_4_1099
    Issue 4
    Journal Abbr RPF
    ISSN 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X
    Date Added 1/31/2026, 7:42:00 PM
    Modified 1/31/2026, 9:22:20 PM

    Tags:

    • responsibility
    • experimental philosophy
    • causal attributions
    • counterfactuals
    • experimental ordinary language philosophy
    • injunctive norms
    • norm effects

    Notes:

    • Alicke, Mark. “Culpable Causation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992): 368–378.

      Alicke, Mark, David Rose, and David Bloom. “Causation, Norm Violation and Culpable Control.” The Journal of Philosophy 108 (2011): 670–696.

      Antoun, Christopher, Chan Zhang, Frederick G. Conrad, and Michael F. Schober. “Comparisons of Online Recruitment Strategies for Convenience Samples: Craigslist, Google AdWords, Facebook, and Amazon Mechanical Turk.” Field Methods 28, no. 3 (2016): 231–246.

      Byrd, Nick, Stephen Stich, and Justin Sytsma. “Analytic Atheism and Analytic Apostasy Across Cultures.” Religious Studies 61 (2025): S65–S89.

      Cushman, Fiery. “Crime and Punishment: Distinguishing the Roles of Causal and Intentional Analyses in Moral Judgment.” Cognition 108 (2008): 353–380.

      Feltz, Adam, and Edward T. Cokely. “Individual Differences in Theory-of-Mind Judgments: Order Effects and Side Effects.” Philosophical Psychology 24, no. 3 (2011): 343–355.

      Fischer, Eugen, Paul Engelhardt, and Justin Sytsma. “Inappropriate Stereotypical Inferences? An Adversarial Collaboration in Experimental Ordinary Language Philosophy.” Synthese 198, no. 11 (2021): 10127–10168.

      Fischer, Eugen, and Justin Sytsma. “Projects and Methods of Experimental Philosophy.” In The Compact Compendium of Experimental Philosophy, edited by Alexander Max Bauer and Stephan Kornmesser, 39–70. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2023.

      Gailey, Jeannine, and Frank Falk. “Attribution of Responsibility as a Multidimensional Concept.” Sociological Spectrum 28 (2008): 659–680.

      Grinfeld, Guy, David Lagnado, Tobias Gerstenberg, James Woodward, and Marius Usher. “Causal Responsibility and Robust Causation.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 1069.

      Güver, Levin, and Markus Kneer. “Causation and the Silly Norm Effect.” In Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Law, edited by Karolina Prochownik and Stefan Magen. London: Bloomsbury, 2023.

      Halpern, Joseph Y., and Christopher Hitchcock. “Graded Causation and Defaults.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2015): 413–457.

      Haug, Matthew. “Fast, Cheap, and Unethical? The Interplay of Morality and Methodology in Crowdsourced Survey Research.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9, no. 2 (2018): 363–379.

      Hitchcock, Christopher, and Joshua Knobe. “Cause and Norm.” The Journal of Philosophy 106 (2009): 587–612.

      Icard, Thomas, Jonathan Kominsky, and Joshua Knobe. “Normality and Actual Causal Strength.” Cognition 161 (2017): 80–93.

      Kim, Hyo-eun, Nina Poth, Kevin Reuter, and Justin Sytsma. “Where Is Your Pain? A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Concept of Pain in Americans and South Koreans.” Studia Philosophica Estonica 9, no. 1 (2016): 136–169.

      Knobe, Joshua, and Ben Fraser. “Causal Judgments and Moral Judgment: Two Experiments.” In Moral Psychology, Volume 2: The Cognitive Science of Morality, edited by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, 441–447. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

      Kominsky, Jonathan, and Jonathan Phillips. “Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection.” Cognitive Science 43, no. 11 (2019): e12792.

      Kominsky, Jonathan, Jonathan Phillips, Tobias Gerstenberg, David Lagnado, and Joshua Knobe. “Causal Superseding.” Cognition 137 (2015): 196–209.

      Lagnado, David, and Shelley Channon. “Judgments of Cause and Blame: The Effects of Intentionality and Foreseeability.” Cognition 108 (2008): 754–770.

      Livengood, Jonathan, and David Rose. “Experimental Philosophy and Causal Attribution.” In A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, edited by Justin Sytsma and Wesley Buckwalter, 434–449. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.

      Livengood, Jonathan, and Justin Sytsma. “Actual Causation and Compositionality.” Philosophy of Science 87, no. 1 (2020): 43–69.

      Livengood, Jonathan, Justin Sytsma, Adam Feltz, Richard Scheines, and Edouard Machery. “Philosophical Temperament.” Philosophical Psychology 23, no. 3 (2010): 313–330.

      Livengood, Jonathan, Justin Sytsma, and David Rose. “Following the FAD: Folk Attributions and Theories of Actual Causation.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8, no. 2 (2017): 274–294.

      Machery, Edouard, Justin Sytsma, and Max Deutsch. “Speaker’s Reference and Cross-Cultural Semantics.” In On Reference, edited by Andrea Bianchi, 62–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

      Malle, Bertram F., Steve Guglielmo, and Andrew Monroe. “A Theory of Blame.” Psychological Inquiry 25 (2014): 147–186.

      Murray, Dylan, Justin Sytsma, and Jonathan Livengood. “God Knows (But Does God Believe?).” Philosophical Studies 166 (2013): 83–107.

      Phillips, Jonathan, Jamie Luguri, and Joshua Knobe. “Unifying Morality’s Influence on Non-Moral Judgments: The Relevance of Alternative Possibilities.” Cognition 145 (2015): 30–42.

      Reuter, Kevin, and Justin Sytsma. “Unfelt Pain.” Synthese 197 (2020): 1777–1801.

      Rose, David. “Folk Intuitions of Actual Causation: A Two-Pronged Debunking Explanation.” Philosophical Studies 174, no. 5 (2017): 1323–1361.

      Rose, David, and Jonathan Schaffer. “Folk Mereology Is Teleological.” Noûs 51, no. 2 (2017): 238–270.

      Samland, Jana, and Michael R. Waldmann. “How Prescriptive Norms Influence Causal Inferences.” Cognition 156 (2016): 164–176.

      Samland, Jana, Marina Josephs, Michael R. Waldmann, and Hannes Rakoczy. “The Role of Prescriptive Norms and Knowledge in Children’s and Adults’ Causal Selection.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145, no. 2 (2016): 125–130.

      Sytsma, Justin. “Structure and Norms: Investigating the Pattern of Effects for Causal Attributions.” PhilSci-Archive, 2019. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16626/.

      Sytsma, Justin. “The Character of Causation: Investigating the Impact of Character, Knowledge, and Desire on Causal Attributions.” PhilSci-Archive, 2019. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16739/.

      Sytsma, Justin. “Causation, Responsibility, and Typicality.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (2021): 699–719.

      Sytsma, Justin. “The Responsibility Account.” In Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Causation, edited by Pascale Willemsen and Alex Wiegmann, 145–164. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.

      Sytsma, Justin. “Crossed Wires: Blaming Artifacts for Bad Outcomes.” The Journal of Philosophy 119, no. 9 (2022): 489–516.

      Sytsma, Justin. “Resituating the Relevance of Alternatives for Causal Attributions.” In Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, vol. 5, edited by Shaun Nichols and Joshua Knobe, 107–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

      Sytsma, Justin, Roland Bluhm, Pascale Willemsen, and Kevin Reuter. “Causal Attributions and Corpus Analysis.” In Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy, edited by Eugen Fischer and Mark Curtis. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.

      Sytsma, Justin, and Jonathan Livengood. The Theory and Practice of Experimental Philosophy. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press, 2015.

      Sytsma, Justin, and Jonathan Livengood. “Causal Attributions and the Trolley Problem.” Philosophical Psychology 34, no. 8 (2021): 1167–1191.

      Sytsma, Justin, Jonathan Livengood, and David Rose. “Two Types of Typicality: Rethinking the Role of Statistical Typicality in Ordinary Causal Attributions.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2012): 814–820.

      Sytsma, Justin, and Edouard Machery. “On the Relevance of Folk Intuitions: A Reply to Talbot.” Consciousness and Cognition 21 (2012): 654–660.

      Sytsma, Justin, and Eyuphan Ozdemir. “No Problem: Evidence that the Concept of Phenomenal Consciousness Is Not Widespread.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 26, nos. 9–10 (2019): 241–256.

      Sytsma, Justin, and Kevin Reuter. “Experimental Philosophy of Pain.” Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34, no. 3 (2017): 611–628.

      Sytsma, Justin, Pascale Willemsen, and Kevin Reuter. “Mutual Entailment Between Causation and Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 180 (2023): 3593–3614.

      Sytsma, Justin, Pascale Willemsen, and Kevin Reuter. “Experimental Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, forthcoming.

      Woodward, James. “Sensitive and Insensitive Causation.” The Philosophical Review 115, no. 1 (2006): 1–50.

      Young, Liane, and Rebecca Saxe. “When Ignorance Is No Excuse: Different Roles for Intent across Moral Domains.” Cognition 120 (2011): 202–214.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa