Apostolado da Oração


Aspectos da Filosofia da Ciência de Pierre Duhem

Aspectos da Filosofia da Ciência de Pierre Duhem

Alexander Maar, “Aspectos da Filosofia da Ciência de Pierre Duhem: Variedades de Subdeterminação Empírica e a Função do Bom Senso na Escolha entre Teorias,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74, no. 1 (2018): 59–84, DOI 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_1_0059

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €


Aspectos da Filosofia da Ciência de Pierre Duhem: Variedades de Subdeterminação Empírica e a Função do Bom Senso na Escolha entre Teorias

Type Journal Article
Author Alexander Maar
Rights © 2018 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural | © 2018 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
Volume 74
Issue 1
Pages 59-84
Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
ISSN 0870-5283
Date 2018
DOI 10.17990/RPF/2018_74_1_0059
Language Portuguese
Abstract As a philosopher of science, Pierre Duhem is most often remembered as the earliest contributor to what became known as the Duhem-Quine thesis. This thesis casts doubt on our ability to isolate and test theories, and to choose between empirically equivalent rivals. By extension, it offers important criticism of the rationality of deductivist science. In contrast with the vast literature produced during the 20th century addressing the problem of empirical underdetermination of theories, little has been said on the viability of the solution Duhem himself proposed to the problem: good sense. In this paper, we offer an analysis of two varieties of underdetermination, discuss when and why they matter, and how good sense is supposed to aid theory choice. We also look at two recent reconstructions of Duhemian good sense, and argue that one is to be favoured.
Date Added 26/04/2018, 14:53:41
Modified 26/04/2018, 15:42:25


  • epistemology,
  • good sense,
  • Pierre Duhem,
  • social consensus,
  • theory choice,
  • underdetermination,
  • virtue epistemology


  • Brumfiel, Geoff. “Neutrinos not faster than light: ICARUS experiment contradicts controversial claim.” Nature (March 16, 2012). doi: 10.1038/nature.2012.10249. 
    Curtler, Hugh Mercer. “Can Virtue Be Taught?” Humanitas 7, no. 1 (1994):  43-50.
    Duhem, Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Traduzido por Philip. W. Wiener. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1954 [1906].
    Duhem, Pierre. German Science: Some Reflections on German Science: German Science and German Virtues. Traduzido por John Lyon. La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1991 [1915]. 
    Duhem, Pierre. Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science. Traduzido e editado por Roger Ariew e Peter Barker. Indianápolis: Hackett, 1996.
    Earman, John. “Underdetermination, Realism, and Reason.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18, no. 1 (1993): 19-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00255.x 
    Fairweather, Abrol. “The epistemic value of good sense.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43, no. 1 (2011): 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.11.003.  
    Fairweather, Abrol. “The epistemic value of good sense.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43, no. 1 (2012): 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.11.003. 
    Gilles, Donald. “The Duhem Thesis and the Quine Thesis.” In Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1993, 98-116.
    Ivanova, Milena. “Pierre Duhem’s Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 41, no. 1 (2010): 58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.12.009.
    Ivanova, Milena. ‘Good Sense’ in Context: A Response to Kidd’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 42, no. 4 (2011): 610-612. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.09.006.
    Ivanova, Milena. “Is There a Place for Epistemic Virtues in Theory Choice?” In Virtue Epistemology Naturalized. Editado por Abrol Fairweather. Cham: Springer, 2014, 207-226. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_13. 
    Ivanova, Milena; Paternotte, Cedric. “Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus.” Erkenntnis 78, no. 5 (2013): 1109-1132. doi: 10.1007/s10670-012-9390-7.
    Kidd, Ian James. “Pierre Duhem’s epistemic aims and the intellectual virtue of humility: A reply to Ivanova.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42, no. 1 (2011): 185-189.  doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.11.007. 
    Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
    Kuhn, Thomas. “Objectividade, Juízo de Valor e Escolha Teórica.” In A Tensão Essencial. Traduzido por Rui Pacheco. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2009, 363-384. 
    Kukla, Andre. “Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals?” Erkenntnis 44, no. 2 (1996): 137-66. doi: 10.1007/bf00166499. 
    Lakatos, Imre. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Editado por Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, 91-196.
    Laudan, Larry. “Demystifying Underdetermination.” In Scientific Theories. Editado por C. Wade Savage. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1990, 267-297.
    Laudan, Larry; Leplin, Jarrett. “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination.” Journal of Philosophy 88 (1991): 449-472. doi: 10.2307/2026601. 
    Maiocchi, Roberto. Chimica e filosofie: Scienza, epistemologia, storia e religione nell’ opera di Pierre Duhem. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice, 1985.
    Maiocchi, Roberto. “Pierre Duhem’s Aim and Structure of Physical Theory: A Book Against Conventionalism.” Synthese 83, no. 3 (1990): 385-400.
    Mill, John Stuart. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co, 1900 [1867].
    Mongin, Philippe. “Duhemian Themes in Expected Utility Theory.” In Boston Studies In The Philosophy Of Science, vol. 276. Editado por Anastasios Brenner e Jean Gayon. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009, 303-357. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9368-5_13  
    Moretti, Luca. “The Tacking by Disjunction Paradox: Bayesianism versus Hypothetico-deductivism.” Erkenntnis 61, no. 1 (2006): 115-138.   
    Morgan, Marry S.; Morrison, Margaret. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 
    Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959. 
    Quine, Willard van Orman. “On Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World.” Erkenntnis 9, no. 3 (1975): 313-328.
    Scerri, Eric R. “Editorial.” Foundations of Chemistry 2, no. 2 (2000): 95-98. doi: 10.1023/a:1009930610570. 
    Sosa, Ernest. “The Coherence of Virtue and the Virtue of Coherence: Justification in Epistemology.” Synthese 64, no. 1 (1985): 3-28. doi: 10.1007/bf00485710.
    Sosa, Ernest. “Proper Functionalism and Virtue Epistemology.” Noûs 27, no. 1 (1993): 51-65. doi:10.2307/2215895. 
    Sosa, Ernest. “Beyond Internal Foundations to External Virtues”, in Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.
    Stanford, Kyle. “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?” Philosophy of Science 68, no. S3 (2001): S1-S12. doi: 10.1086/392893.
    Strevens, Michael. “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.” The Journal of Philosophy 100, no. 2 (2003): 55-79. doi: 10.5840/jphil2003100224.  
    Stump, David. “Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38, no. 1 (2007): 149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.010. 
    Van Fraassen, Bas. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.  
    Zagzebski, Linda T. Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.


Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar