|Publication||Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia|
|Abstract||Metaphor has no place in science, some claim; no, others argue, metaphor is crucial to science. Science is a rational enterprise with its own distinctive logical structure; no, it isn’t essentially different from literature, equally a kind of world-making. There is a distinctive metaphorical kind of meaning; no, metaphorical utterances have only their literal meanings, in which they are just plain false. Conspicuous by its absence is the reasonable middle ground Haack will be mapping here. Metaphor is useful, but not essential, to scientific work; metaphors don’t have a special kind of meaning, but they do have a special pragmatic role; scientific work and the writing of fiction do have important things in common, but there are also significant differences between the two enterprises. Once we understand how science works (§1), and then how metaphors work (§2), we can articulate the similarities, and differences, between scientific metaphors and literary ones (§3).|
|Date Added||1/28/2020, 4:32:31 PM|
|Modified||1/28/2020, 5:17:55 PM|
Aristotle, Rhetoric. Translated by W. Rhys Roberts. In The Complete Works. Revised Oxford Trans. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1985.
Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. Edited by Fulton H. Anderson. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1960. First published 1620.
Black, Max. “Metaphor.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 55 (1954-55): 273–94. Reprinted in Max Black, Models and Metaphors, 25–47. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1962.
Boyd, Richard. “Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is Metaphor a Metaphor For?” In Ortony, Metaphor and Thought, 356–408.
Bridgman, Percy. “On Scientific Method.” In Paul Bridgman, Reflections of a Physicist, 81–83. 2nd ed. New York: Philosophical Library, 1955. First published 1949.
Cicero. de Oratore. Translated by E.W. Sutton and H. Racham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942. https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.marcus_tullius_cicero-de_oratore.1942
Davidson, Donald. “What Metaphors Mean.” In Donald Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, 245–64. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984. First published 1978. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199246297.003.0017.
Frege, Gottlob. “On Sense and Reference.” In Selected Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Peter Geach and Max Black, 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952. First published 1892.
Fogelin, Robert. Figuratively Speaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988.
Haack, Susan. “Surprising Noises: Rorty and Hesse on Metaphor.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88 (1987-88): 179–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/88.1.293.
Haack, Susan. “Dry Truth and Real Knowledge.” In Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 69–89. First published 1994.
Haack, Susan. “Puzzling Out Science.” In Haack, Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate, 90–103. First published 1995.
Haack, Susan. Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Haack, Susan. “Science, Literature, and the “Literature of Science.” American Council of Learned Societies Occasional Paper no. 47 (2000): 45–56.
Haack, Susan. Defending Science—Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003.
Hentschel, Klaus. “Atomic Models, J.J. Thomson’s ‘Plum Pudding’ Model.” In Compendium of Quantum Physics, edited by Daniel Greenberger, Klaus Hentschel, and Friedel Weinert, 18–21. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_9.
Hesse, Mary. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press, 1966.
Hesse, Mary. “Tropical Talk: The Myth of the Literal.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society S61 (1986): 294–411.
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Edited by C. B. McPherson. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1968. First Published 1651.
James, P.D. Children of Men. London: Faber and Faber, 1992.
Judson, Horace Freeland. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979.
Kuhn, Thomas. “Metaphor in Science.” In Ortony, Metaphor and Thought, 409–19.
Le Guin, Ursula. The Left Hand of Darkness. New York: Ace Books, 1969.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. 1690. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020.
Ortony, Andrew, ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Peirce, C. S. Collected Papers. Edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and (vols. 7 and 8) Arthur Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931-58.
Perry, Anne. No Graves as Yet. New York: Ballantine Books, 2004. First published 2003.
Perry, Anne. Shoulder the Sky. New York, Ballantine Books, 2005. First published 2004.
Perry, Anne. Angels in the Gloom. New York: Ballantine Books, 2006. First published 2005.
Perry, Anne. At Some Disputed Barricade? New York: Ballantine Books, 2008. First published 2007.
Quintilian. Intsttutio Oratoria. Translated by H.E. Butler. London: Heineman, 1922.
Read, John. From Alchemy to Chemistry. New York: Dover Publications, 1995). First published 1957.
Rorty, Richard. “Unfamiliar Noises: Rorty and Hesse on Metaphor.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society S61 (1986): 283–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/61.1.283.
Rorty, Richard, “The World Well Lost.” Journal of Philosophy 69, no.19 (1972): 649–775. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025059.
Sayers, Dorothy. Gaudy Night. New York: HarperPaperbacks, 1995. First published 1936.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation, Translated by E. F. J. Payne. New York: Dover Publications, 1966). First published 1844.
Searle, John. “Metaphor.” in Ortony, Metaphor and Thought, 92–123. First published1979.
Stendhal. Le Rouge et le Noir. Paris: Levavasseur, 1831.
Wallace, Irving. The Man. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1964.
Watson, James. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of DNA. Edited by Gunther Stent. Critical ed. New York: W. W. Norton, 1980. First published 1967.
Total 0,00 €