Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

A Insuficiência das Leis: uma Reflexão sobre o Pensamento de Antifonte

A Insuficiência das Leis: uma Reflexão sobre o Pensamento de Antifonte

Cristiane A. de Azevedo, “A Insuficiência das Leis: uma Reflexão sobre o Pensamento de Antifonte,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77, no. 1 (2021): 235–50, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2021_77_1_0235.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

137710235

Disponível apenas on-line

  • A Insuficiência das Leis: uma Reflexão sobre o Pensamento de Antifonte

    Type Journal Article
    Author Cristiane A. de Azevedo
    Rights © 2021 by Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    Volume 77
    Issue 1
    Pages 235-250
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    ISSN 0870-5283
    Date 2021
    Extra The Inadequacy of Laws: a Reflection on the Thought of Antiphon
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2021_77_1_0235
    Language Portuguese
    Abstract In the 5th century BC, in Athens, Antiphon reflects on the relationship between physis and nómos in a way quite different from most sophists. Indeed, one of the particularities of sophist thought is to minimize physis so that thinking focus itself on nómos, on what man can, through thinking and debate, establish in regard to the common good and justice in the pólis. However, Antiphon takes up this relationship between nature and law to direct it to another path. In an unusual way for a sophist, we see physis being emphasized at the expense of nómos. The comparison between the two concepts also serves as a backdrop for harsh criticisms of justice and laws. The objective of this article is, through the criticisms Antiphon makes to the system of the laws of the pólis, to think about the relationship established by the sophist between physis and nómos in order to find out if there is a new understanding of these concepts and to reflect the reason that led Antiphon to revisit them.
    Date Added 4/29/2021, 12:33:15 AM
    Modified 4/29/2021, 11:43:29 AM

    Notes:

    • Antifonte. Testemunhos, fragmentos, discursos. Trad.: Luis Felipe Bellintani Ribeiro. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola, 2008.
      Casertano, Giovanni. Sofista. São Paulo: Odysseus, 2010.
      Cassin, Barbara. “Barbariser” et “citoyenner” ou On n’échappe pas à Antiphon. Rue Descartes, no. 3, Citoyenneté, démocratie, république (Janvier 1992), pp. 19-34.
      Chantraine, P. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Paris : Ed. Klincksieck, 1968.
      Cordero, Nestor Luis. A invenção da filosofia. São Paulo: Odysseus, 2011.
      Darbo-Peschanski, Catherine. Antiphon : la nature avec la loi et sans l’ intérêt personnel, Philosophie Antique, n.13 , (2013), 173-223.
      Hesíodo. Os trabalhos e os dias. Trad. Luiz Otávio F. Mantovaneli. São Paulo: Odisseus, 2011.
      Hesíodo. Teogonia. Trad. Jaa Torrano. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 2009.
      Homère. L’Odyssée. Médéric Dufour et Jeanne Raison (trad.). Paris: Flammarion, 1965.
      Homero. Odisseia. Trad. Carlos Alberto Nunes. Rio de Janeiro: Ediouro, 2002.
      Kerferd, G. B., O movimento sofista. São Paulo: Ed. Loyola, 2003.
      Kerferd, G. B., The moral and Political doctrines of Antiphon the Sophist. A reconsideration. The Cambridge Classical Journal, Volume 4, 1957, pp 26 – 32.
      Levystone, David. Antiphon: indifférence de la nature, misère des lois humaines Phoenix, Vol. 68, No. 3/4, 2014, pp. 258-290.
      Naddaf, Gérard. Le concept de nature chez les présocratiques. Klincksieck, 2008.
      Ribeiro, Luis Felipe Bellintani. Filosofia e doxografia: o artefato Antifonte. Rio de Janeiro: Hexis, 2012.
      Romilly, Jacqueline. Les grands sophistes dans l’Athènes de Périclès. Paris: Ed. de Fallois, 1988.
      Untersteiner, Mario. A obra dos sofistas: uma interpretação filosófica. São Paulo: Paulus, 2012.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa