Gene Centrism, Causal Specificity and Missing Heritability
Gökhan Akbay, “Gene Centrism, Causal Specificity and Missing Heritability,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77, no. 4 (2021): 1455–78, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2021_77_4_1455.
Gökhan Akbay, “Gene Centrism, Causal Specificity and Missing Heritability,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77, no. 4 (2021): 1455–78, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2021_77_4_1455.
Type | Journal Article |
---|---|
Author | Gökhan Akbay |
Rights | © 2021 by Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
Volume | 77 |
Issue | 4 |
Pages | 1455-1478 |
Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
ISSN | 0870-5283 |
Date | 2021 |
DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2021_77_4_1455 |
Language | English |
Abstract | Gene centrism is the idea that genes have a privileged causal role in the ontogeny of phenotypes. It has traditionally been defended on the grounds that genetic causation is a special kind of causation. According to this viewpoint, genes are special causal agents because they carry the information to build the organism. The recent trend in the philosophy of biology is to replace informational concepts with causal ones. Specific influence of genes in the production of RNA and proteins has received much attention. However, the history of genetics shows that gene centrism concerns not only the most proximate effects of genes, but also higher level phenotypes and the kind of specificity required to justify gene centrism must extend beyond proteins and RNAs. The missing heritability problem implies that it is no easy task to find specific causal relations between genomes and phenotypes. It seems to be the case that thousands of genes somehow influence variation in any complex trait and genomic findings offer no clear-cut mechanistic explanation. Thus, causal specificity concepts currently employed in philosophy are inadequate for answering the substantive problem of genotype-phenotype relations. |
Date Added | 1/31/2022, 10:52:27 PM |
Modified | 1/31/2022, 11:56:45 PM |
Altenburg, Edgar, and Hermann J Muller. “The Genetic Basis of Truncate Wing,—an Inconstant and Modifiable Character in Drosophila.” Genetics 5, no. 2 (1920): 248–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/5.2.248.
Beadle, George Wells, and Edward L. Tatum. “Genetic Control of Biochemical Reactions in Neurospora.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 27, no. 11 (1941): 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.27.11.499.
Beadle, George Wells. “Genetics and Metabolism in Neurospora.” Physiological Reviews 25, no. 4 (1945): 643–63. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1945.25.4.643.
Beadle, Georgerge Wells. “Biochemical Genetics.” Chemical Reviews 37, no. 1 (1945): 15–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60116a002.
Boyle, Evan A., Yang I. Li, and Jonathan K. Pritchard. “An Expanded View of Complex Traits: From Polygenic to Omnigenic.” Cell 169, no. 7 (2017): 1177–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.038.
Castle, William Ernest, and John C. Phillips. Piebald Rats and Selection.: An Experimental Test of the Effectiveness of Selection and of the Theory of Gametic Purity in Mendelian Crosses. Washington, D.C, 1914.
Crick, Francis. “On Protein Synthesis.” Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 12 (1958): 138–63.
DiFrisco, James, and Johannes Jaeger. “Genetic Causation in Complex Regulatory Systems: An Integrative Dynamic Perspective.” BioEssays 42, no. 6 (2020): 1900226. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900226.
Falk, Raphael. Genetic Analysis: A History of Genetic Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Garrod, Archibald E. Inborn Errors of Metabolism: The Croonian Lectures Delivered before the Royal College of Physicians of London, in June, 1908. London: Frowde, 1923. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/m7bbgbjc/items.
Garrod, ArchibaldE. “The Incidence of Alkaptonuria : A Study in Chemical Individuality.” The Lancet 160, no. 4137 (1902): 1616–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)41972-6.
Gilbert, Walter. “A Vision of the Grail.” Essay. In The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, edited by Daniel J. Kevles and Leroy Hood, 83–97. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Gregor Mendel. “Experiments in Plant Hybridization,” In William Bateson, Mendel’s Principles of Heredity: A Defence, with a Translation of Mendel’s Original Papers on Hybridisation, 40–95. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.
Hermann J. Muller. “The Bearing of the Selection Experiments of Castle and Phillips on the Variability of Genes.” The American Naturalist 48, no. 573 (1914): 567–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/279431.
Jablonka, Eva. “Some Problems with Genetic Horoscopes.” Essay. In Genetic Explanations Sense and Nonsense, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Jeremy Gruber, 72–80. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Jacob, François, and Jacques Monod. “Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms in the Synthesis of Proteins.” Journal of Molecular Biology 3, no. 3 (1961): 318–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(61)80072-7.
Jacob, François, David Perrin, Carmen Sánchez, and Jacques Monod. “L’opéron : Groupe De Gènes à Expression Coordonnée Par Un Opérateur [C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 250 (1960) 1727–1729].” Comptes Rendus Biologies 328, no. 6 (2005): 514–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2005.04.005.
Kandel, Eric R. Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and the New Biology of Mind. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publ., 2005.
Keller, Evelyn Fox. “Genes as Difference Makers.” Essay. In Genetic Explanations Sense and Nonsense, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Jeremy Gruber, 34–42. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Kevles, Daniel J., and James Watson. “A Personal View of the Project.” Essay. In The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, edited by Leroy E. Hood, 164–77. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Lewis, David. “Causation as Influence.” The Journal of Philosophy 97, no. 4 (2000): 182. https://doi.org/10.2307/2678389.
Lewontin, Richard C. “The Dream of the Human Genome.” Essay. In It Ain’t Necessarily so: The Dream of the Human Genome and Other Illusions, 133–95. New York: New York Review Books, 2001.
Maynard-Smith, John, and Szathmáry Eörs. The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Monod, Jacques. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. London: Collins, 1972.
Morgan, Thomas Hunt. The Theory of the Gene. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1926.
Muller Hermann J. “Variation Due to Change in the Individual Gene.” The American Naturalist 56, no. 642 (1922): 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1086/279846.
Muller, Hermann J. “The Gene Material as the Initiator and the Organizing Basis of Life.” The American Naturalist 100, no. 915 (1966): 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1086/282445.
Olby, Robert. The Path to the Double Helix the Discovery of DNA. Newburyport: Dover Publications, 2013.
Pauling, Linus. “Molecular Structure and Biological Specificity.” “Molecular structure and biological specificity.” – manuscript notes and typescripts – it’s in the blood! A documentary history of Linus Pauling, hemoglobin and sickle cell anemia. Accessed 15/10/2021. http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/blood/notes/1947a.3.html.
Pearson, Helen. “What Is a Gene?” Nature 441, no. 7092 (2006): 398–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/441398a.
Peter, Isabelle S., and Eric H. Davidson. Genomic Control Process: Development and Evolution. Academic Press, 2015.
Plomin, Robert, John C. DeFries, Gerald E. McLearn, and Peter McGuffin. Behavioral Genetics. 5th ed. New York: Worth, 2008.
Sarkar, Sahotra. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Sarkar, Sahotra. Molecular Models of Life: Philosophical Papers on Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2005.
Stegmann, Ulrich E. “Varieties of Parity.” Biology & Philosophy 27, no. 6 (2012): 903–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9331-5.
Stegmann, Ulrich. “Causal Control and Genetic Causation.” Noûs 48, no. 3 (2014): 450–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00867.x.
Stotz, Karola, and Paul E. Griffiths. Essay. In From Matter to Life: Information and Causality, edited by Sara Imari Walker, Davies Paul C W., and Ellis George F R., 366–90. Cambridge: University Press, 2017.
Tauber, Alfred I., and Sahotra Sarkar. “The Ideology of the Human Genome Project.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 86, no. 9 (September 1993): 537–40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1294105/?page=1.
The ENCODE Project Consortium. “Identification and Analysis of Functional Elements in 1% of the Human Genome by the Encode Pilot Project.” Nature 447, no. 7146 (2007): 799–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05874.
Turkheimer, Eric. “Genome Wide Association Studies of Behavior Are Social Science.” Philosophy of Behavioral Biology, 2012, 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1951-4_3.
Turkheimer, Eric. “Heritability and Biological Explanation.” Psychological Review 105, no. 4 (1998): 782–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.105.4.782-791.
Venter, Craig J., Mark D. Adams, Eugene W. Myers, Peter W. Li, Richard J. Mural, Granger G. Sutton, and Hamilton O. Smith. “The Sequence of the Human Genome.” Science 291, no. 5507 (2001): 1304–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058040.
Weber, Marcel. “The Central Dogma as a Thesis of Causal Specificity.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28, no. 4 (2006): 595–609.
Williams, George C. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, N.J, 1966.
Williams, George C. Natural Selection: Domains, Levels, and Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Woodward, James F. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Woodward, James. “Causation in Biology: Stability, Specificity, and the Choice of Levels of Explanation.” Biology & Philosophy 25, no. 3 (2010): 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9200-z.
Yang, Jian, Beben Benyamin, Brian P McEvoy, Scott Gordon, Anjali K Henders, Dale R Nyholt, Pamela A Madden, et al. “Common Snps Explain a Large Proportion of the Heritability for Human Height.” Nature Genetics 42, no. 7 (2010): 565–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.608.