Categorias

Produtos vistos

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

A ‘Modest’ Primitivist Theory of Truth: The Ineffability of Truth, Effability of the Correspondence Relation

A ‘Modest’ Primitivist Theory of Truth: The Ineffability of Truth, Effability of the Correspondence Relation

Marco Simionato, “A ‘Modest’ Primitivist Theory of Truth: The Ineffability of Truth, Effability of the Correspondence Relation,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 79, no. 3 (2023): 937–64, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2023_79_3_0937.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

12790937

Disponível apenas on-line

  • A “Modest” Primitivist Theory of Truth: The Ineffability of Truth, Effability of the Correspondence Relation

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Marco Simionato
    Abstract The primitivist theory of truth, i.e., the view that truth cannot be analysed in more fundamental terms, has been cleverly revamped by Jamin Asay, who has combined a primitivist approach to the concept of truth with a deflationary approach to the (metaphysical) property of being true. This paper aims to adjust Asay’s primitivist theory to consistently include the primitiveness of the (pre-theoretical) correspondence relation, grasped by our correspondence intuition, alongside the primitiveness of truth. In the process, I apply a thesis by Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson, according to which the correspondence of beliefs to facts (broadly construed) can occur with no commitment to a correspondence theory of truth. Then I argue why Asay’s theory might not be able to account for the primitiveness of the pre-theoretical correspondence relation. Finally, I use a suggestion by André Kukla concerning the possible entailment between an ineffable insight and its effable consequences, to build a revised primitivist theory of truth.
    Date 2023
    Language English
    Rights © 2023 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Volume 79
    Pages 937-964
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2023_79_3_0937
    Issue 3
    ISSN 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X
    Date Added 11/1/2023, 1:42:15 AM
    Modified 11/1/2023, 1:49:59 AM

    Tags:

    • correspondence relation, ineffable concepts, nature of truth, Moorean common-sense, nominal essence of truth, primitivist theory of truth.

    Notes:

    • Aristotle, Metaphysics. Translated by William David Ross. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928.

      Armstrong, David Malet. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487552

      Asay, Jamin. The Primitivist Theory of Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139856003

      Asay, Jamin. “TRUTH: A Concept Unlike Any Other.” Synthese 198, no. 2 (February 2018): 605-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1661-z

      Azzouni, Jody. “Inconsistency in Natural Languages.” Synthese 190, no.15 (October 2013): 3175-3184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0136-5

      Bennett-Hunter, Guy. Ineffability and Religious Experience. London and New York: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315654119

      Dodd, Julian. An identity theory of truth. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008 (2nd edition). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62870-4

      Eklund, Matti. “What is Deflationism about Truth?.” Synthese 198, no. 2 (February 2021): 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1557-y

      Gäb, Sebastain, “The Paradox of Ineffability.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 78, no. 3 (January 2017): 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2016.1277155

      Gäb, Sebastain, “Ineffability: The Very Concept.” Philosophia 48, no. 5 (November 2020): 1825-1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00198-2

      Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary Rosenkrantz. “Omnipotence”. In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Charles Taliaferro, Paul Draper, and Philip L. Quinn, 243-249. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. DOI 10.1002/9781444320152.ch27

      Ingthorsson, Rögnvaldur. “There’s no Truth-Theory like the Correspondence Theory.” Discusiones Filosóficas 20, no. 34 (June 2019): 15-41. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.34.2

      Jonas, Silvia. Ineffability and its Metaphysics. The Unspeakable in Art, Religion and Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137579553

      Kukla, André. Ineffability and Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.

      Lynch, P. Michael. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218738.001.0001

      Miller, T.M. James. “Are all primitives created equal?.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 56, no. 2 (June 2018): 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjp.12279

      Moore, Adrian, and Peter Sullivan. “Ineffability and Nonsense.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77, no. 1 (Supplementary Volume 2003): 169-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00108

      Moore, George Edward (1925), “A Defence of Common Sense”. In Selected Writings, edited by Thomas Baldwin, 106-133. London: Routledge, 1993.

      Quine, Willard V. Orman. “Ontology and Ideology.” Philosophical Studies 2, no.1 (January 1951): 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198233

      Shaw, R. James. “Truth, Paradox, and Ineffable Propositions.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86, no. 1 (January 2013): 64-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00530.x

Pesquisa

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal