Michaël Bauwens, “Social Metaphysics, Social Ontology and the Possibility of Social Reality,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 80, no. 3 (2024): 997–1026, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2024_80_3_0997.
| Item Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Michaël Bauwens |
| Abstract | One of the emerging fields within analytic metaphysics is social ontology. This paper argues for a distinction between social metaphysics and social ontology in order to clear up some of the confusion that is plaguing the field. That terminological distinction has deep historical and philosophical roots which are relevant for the specific case of social reality. According to the proposed distinction, social metaphysics takes up the most fundamental questions pertaining to the very nature and being of social reality, whereas social ontology has the more specific task of drawing an inventory of social reality as it exists and elucidating the properties of its items and categories. The distinction itself is further specified as involving both abstraction and asymmetry. One can abstract from one domain while focusing upon the other, which is different from separating or isolating one domain from the other. There is an asymmetry between the two domains whereby social metaphysics enables and conditions social ontology, but not vice versa. |
| Date | 2024 |
| Language | English |
| Rights | © 2024 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural |
| Volume | 80 |
| Pages | 997-1026 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2024_80_3_0997 |
| Issue | 3 |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X |
| Date Added | 10/30/2024, 8:54:33 PM |
| Modified | 10/30/2024, 9:16:43 PM |
Baker, Lynne Rudder. “Human Persons as Social Entities.” Journal of Social Ontology 1, no. 1 (January 1, 2015): 77–87.
Bauwens, Michaël. “An Institutional Metaphysics for the Trinity.” TheoLogica: An International Journal for Philosophy of Religion and Philosophical Theology 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 219–44.
Bauwens, Michaël. “Causes, Contingency and Freedom: A Reply to Anscombe, Mumford and Anjum.” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 77, no. 4 (2021): 1315–38.
Bauwens, Michaël. “Freedom, Counterfactuals and Economic Laws: Further Comments on Machaj and Hülsmann.” The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 20, no. 4 (2017): 366–72.
Bauwens, Michaël. “From Searle to Scotus and Back: Institutions, Powers, and Mary.” The Heythrop Journal 64, no. 1 (January 2023): 3–15.
Bauwens, Michaël. “Sur Les Fondements Métaphysiques et Les Contours Théologiques Des Sciences Sociales: Réalisme, Nominalisme et Création Contingente.” In Le Réalisme En Sciences Sociales ; état Des Lieux, edited by Olga Peniaz and Hélène Terrom, 11–42. Patrimoines. Editions du CERF, 2024.
Bauwens, Michaël. “The Ontology of Fractional Reserve Banking.” Journal of Institutional Economics 13, no. 2 (June 2017): 447–66.
Boulter, Stephen. “The Medieval Origins of Conceivability Arguments.” Metaphilosophy 42, no. 5 (2011): 617–41.
Corvino, John. “Same-Sex Marriage and the Definitional Objection.” In Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics, edited by Andrew I. Cohen and Christopher H. Wellman, 22–277. Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
Duns Scotus, Joannes. Contingency and Freedom : Lectura I 39. 205 p. The New Synthese Historical Library : Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy 42. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994.
Epstein, Brian. “A Framework for Social Ontology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46, no. 2 (March 1, 2016): 147–67.
Epstein, Brian. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Ferraris, Maurizio. Documentality: Why It Is Necessary to Leave Traces. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.
Ferraris, Maurizio. “Perspectives of Documentality.” Phenomenology and Mind 2 (2012): 39–48.
Friedman, Jonathan. “Comment on Searle’s ‘Social Ontology.’” Anthropological Theory 6, no. 1 (2006): 70–80.
Grassl, Wolfgang. “The Reality of Brands: Towards an Ontology of Marketing.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 58 (1999): 313–60.
Guala, Francesco. Understanding Institutions: The Science and Philosophy of Living Together. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2016.
Hoeres, Walter. Gradatio Entis: Sein Als Teilhabe Bei Duns Scotus Und Franz Suarez. 239 p. Editiones Scholasticae 14. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos, 2012.
Honnefelder, Ludger. “Die Kritik des Johannes Duns Scotus am kosmologischen Nezessitarismus der Araber: Ansätze zu einem neuen Freiheitsbegriff.” Vorträge und Forschungen 39 (1991): 249–63.
Honnefelder, Ludger. Johannes Duns Scotus. Denker Auf Der Schwelle Vom Mittelalterlichen Zum Neuzeitlichen Denken. Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2011.
Hülsmann, Jörg Guido. “Facts and Counterfactuals in Economic Law.” The Journal of Libertarian Studies 17, no. 1 (2003): 57–102.
Jaroszyński, Piotr. Metaphysics Or Ontology? (Value Inquiry Book Series / Gilson Studies). Brill Rodopi, 2018.
Kobusch, Theo. “Die Moderne Sozialontologie Und Ihr Historischer Hintergrund.” In Sozialontologie in Der Perspektive Des Deutschen Idealismus: Ansätze, Rezeptionen, Probleme, edited by Christian Krijnen and Stephan Zimmermann, 1–20. De Gruyter, 2018.
Lawson, Tony. “A Conception of Social Ontology.” In Social Ontology and Modern Economics, edited by Stephen Pratten, 37:19–52. Economics as Social Theory. London: Routledge, 2015.
Lawson, Tony. Economics and Reality. London: Routledge, 1997.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Thomas Tegg, 1841.
Long, R. T. “Realism and Abstraction in Economics: Aristotle and Mises versus Friedman.” Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 9, no. 3 (2006): 3–23.
Massie, Pascal. Contingency, Time, and Possibility: An Essay on Aristotle and Duns Scotus. IX, 305 p. Plymouth: Lexington books, 2011.
Pelletier, Jenny, and Christian Rode, eds. The Reality of the Social World: Medieval, Early Modern, and Contemporary Perspectives on Social Ontology. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action. Springer International Publishing, 2023.
Quine, Willard Van Orman. “On What There Is.” The Review of Metaphysics 2, no. 5 (1948): 21–38.
Rode, Christian. Soziale Ontologien des Mittelalters: Der Status der politischen Gemeinschaft und das Mängelwesen Mensch. Aschendorff Verlag, 2022.
Schmidt, Axel. “Zwischen Naturalismus Und Voluntarismus. Was Uns Die Philosophie Und Theologie Des Johannes Duns Scotus Zu Denken Gibt.” Wissenschaft Und Weisheit 70, no. 1 (2007): 62–80.
Searle, John R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Searle, John R. “Reality and Social Construction: Reply to Friedman.” Anthropological Theory 6, no. 1 (March 1, 2006): 81–88.
Smith, Barry. “Document Acts.” In Institutions, Emotions, and Group Agents: Contributions to Social Ontology, edited by Anita Konzelmann Ziv and Hans Bernhard Schmid, 2:19–31. Studies in the Philosophy of Sociality. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
Smith, Barry. “How to Do Things with Documents.” Rivista Di Estetica 2, no. 50 (2012): 179–98.
Smit, J. P., Filip Buekens, and Stan du Plessis. “Developing the Incentivized Action View of Institutional Reality.” Synthese 191, no. 8 (2014): 1813–30.
Söder, Joachim R. “Notwendigkeit – Kontingenz – Freiheit.” 212 p. In Zwischen Weisheit Und Wissenschaft : Johannes Duns Scotus Im Gespräch, edited by Franz Lackner, 170–78. Franziskanische Forschungen 45. Werl: Coelde, 2003.
Thatcher, Margaret. “Interview for Woman’s Own (‘no Such Thing as Society’).” Margaret Thatcher Foundation, September 23, 1987. http://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/106689.
Tieffenbach, Emma. “Searle and Menger on Money.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40, no. 2 (May 17, 2010): 191–212.
Varzi, Achille C. “On Doing Ontology without Metaphysics.” Philosophical Perspectives. A Supplement to Nous 25, no. 1 (December 1, 2011): 407–23.
Widerker, David, and Michael McKenna. Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2006.
