Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

Scepticism About Neo-Aristotelian Essences

Scepticism About Neo-Aristotelian Essences

Benjamin Curtis and Harold Noonan, “Scepticism About Neo-Aristotelian Essences,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 80, no. 4 (2024): 885–904, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2024_80_4_0885.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

128040885

Disponível apenas on-line

  • Scepticism About Neo-Aristotelian Essences

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Benjamin Curtis
    Author Harold Noonan
    Abstract Many philosophers today accept the broadly Aristotelian view that one can explain de re necessary properties by invoking essence. These ‘Neo-Aristotelian essentialists’ hold that a property F is an essential property of x iff specifying F gives a correct answer to the Aristotelian ‘what is x?’ question. We are sceptical. According to neo-Aristotelian essentialists, essential properties are not themselves de re modal properties, but they are supposed to explain why things have their de re modal properties. Neo-Aristotelian essentialists accept the following principle (ENL): If x is essentially F, then x is necessarily F. We ask: Why? We first clarify the neo-Aristotelian notion of essence via the Aristotelian “what is x?” question. So far as we can see, the only way to do this is by appeal to the notion of a substance sortal. We then consider the notion of a substance sortal itself, and argue that there is nothing in that notion that even so much as suggests that ENL is true.
    Date 2024
    Language English
    Rights © 2024 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Volume 80
    Pages 885-904
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
    DOI 10.17990/RPF/2024_80_4_0885
    Issue 4
    Date Added 12/6/2024, 8:32:51 PM
    Modified 12/6/2024, 10:09:17 PM

    Tags:

    • essence, Fine, identity, Lowe, necessity, sortal, substance.

    Notes:

    • Cowling, Sam. “The Modal View of Essence.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43, no. 2 (2013): 248–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2013.827395.

      Dunn, J. Michael ‘Relevant predication III: essential properties’’, in Truth or Consequences: Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap. Edited by Dunn, J. Michael, and Anil Gupta, 77-95. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0681-5.

      Fine, Kit. “Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture.” Philosophical Perspectives 8 (1994): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214160.

      Fine, Kit; “Ontological Dependence”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1995): 269-90. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristote.

      Fine, K. “Senses of Essence”. In Modality, Morality, and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. Edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong, D. Raffman, and N. Asher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 53–73. 052144082

      Fine, Kit. “Semantics for the Logic of Essence.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 29, no. 6 (December 2000): 543–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026591900038.

      Fine, Kit. “ Necessity and Non‐Existence.” In Modality and Tense, by Kit Fine, 321–54, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199278709.003.0010.

      Gorman, Michael. “The essential and the accidental.” Ratio 18, no. 3 (September 2005): 276–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2005.00290.x.

      Jago, Mark. “Knowing How Things Might Have Been.” Synthese 198, no. S8 (April 2021): 1981–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1869-6.

      Kripke, Saul ‘Naming and Necessity’. In Semantics of Natural Language. 2. ed., 3. Print, 252-355. Edited by Davidson, Donald, and Gilbert Harman, Synthese Library 40. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7.

      Kripke, Saul A. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Univ. Press, 1980. 0674598458

      Lowe, E. J. “Review: How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties.” Mind 116, no. 463 (July 1, 2007): 762–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm762.

      Lowe, E. J. “Two Notions of Being: Entity and Essence.” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 62 (July 2008): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246108000568.

      Lowe, E. J. “Locke on Real Essence and Water as a Natural Kind: A Qualified Defence.” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85, no. 1 (June 1, 2011): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2011.00193.x.

      Lowe, E. J. “The Probable Simplicity of Personal Identity.” Chapter. In Personal Identity: Complex or Simple?, edited by Georg Gasser and Matthias Stefan, 137–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12035.

      Lowe, E. J. “What Is the Source of Our Knowledge of Modal Truths?” Mind 121, no. 484 (October 1, 2012): 919–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzs122.

      Lowe, E. J. “Objects and Criteria of Identity.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, edited by Bob Hale, Crispin Wright, and Alexander Miller, 1st ed., 990–1012. Wiley, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118972090.ch39.

      Mackie, Penelope. How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties. 1st ed. Oxford University Press Oxford, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199272204.001.0001.

      Wiggins, David. Identity and Spatio-Temporal Continuity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967. 10: 0631103708 

      Wiggins, D. 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612756

      Wildman, Nathan. “Modality, Sparsity, and Essence.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63, no. 253 (October 2013): 760–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.12059.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa