A Model-Based Form of Naturalised Metaphysics

A Model-based Form of Naturalised Metaphysics

Tags:

• analytic philosophy, meta-metaphysics, naturalised metaphysics, science and philosophy.

Notes:

• Allori, Valia. “Quantum Ontology and Intuitions.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 14, no. 3 (September 2024): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00595-4.

  Benovsky, Jiri. Meta-Metaphysics: On Metaphysical Equivalence, Primitiveness, and Theory Choice. Vol. 374. Synthese Library. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25334-3.

  Berto, Francesco. Existence as a Real Property: The Ontology of Meinongianism. Synthese Library 356. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.

  Birkhoff, Garrett, and John Von Neumann. “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics.” The Annals of Mathematics 37, no. 4 (October 1936): 823-843. https://doi.org/10.2307/1968621.

  Carnap, Rudolf. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4, no. 11 (1950): 20-40.

  Casati, Roberto, and Achille C. Varzi. Parts and Places: The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge: MIT press, 1999.

  Chalmers, David J. “Ontological Anti-Realism”. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Ryan Wasserman, David Manley, and David J. Chalmers, 77-129. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  Chalmers, David J. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

  Chalmers, David J., David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman eds. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  Correia, Fabrice, and Benjamin Schnieder eds. Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139149136.

  Corti, Alberto, and Vincenzo, Fano, “La metafisica è morta. Lunga vita alla metafisica.” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-scolastica 4, (2020): 1-31

  Cotnoir, Aaron J., and Achille C. Varzi. Mereology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2021.

  Dennett, Daniel C. “The Unimagined Preposterousness of Zombies.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 2, no. 4 (1995): 322–26.

  De Florio, Ciro, and Alessandro Giordani, “Alcune ipotesi sulla possibilità della metafisica,” Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, 42 (2020): 943-967.

  Emery, Nina. Naturalism Beyond the Limits of Science: How Scientific Methodology Can and Should Shape Philosophical Theorizing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.

  Esfeld, Michael. “Metaphysics of Science as Naturalized Metaphysics.” In The Philosophy of Science. A Companion, edited by Anouk Barberousse, Denis Bonnay, and Mikaël Cozic, 142–70. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.

  Fano, Vincenzo. “Physics and Metaphysics.” In Open Problems in Philosophy of Science, edited by Pierluigi Graziani, Luca Guzzardi and Massimo Sangoi, 186-194. London: College, London, 2013.

  Fano, Vincenzo. Comprendere la scienza: un’introduzione all’epistemologia delle scienze naturali. Napoli: Liguori, 2005.

  Fano, Vincenzo, and Matera, Sara. “Scientific realism and phenomenological constraint.” Hermeneutica (2014): 95-108

  Fine, Kit. “The Question of Ontology.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Ryan Wasserman, David Manley, and David J. Chalmers, 157-177. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  French, Steven, and Décio Krause. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

  French, Steven, and Kerry McKenzie. “Rethinking Outside the Toolbox: Reflecting Again on the Relationship between Philosophy of Science and Metaphysics.” In Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, edited by Tomasz Bigaj and Christian Wüthrich, 25–54. Boston: Brill, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004310827_003.

  Gendler, Tamar Szabó, and John P. Hawthorne. Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

  Hofweber, Thomas. “Ambitious, yet Modest, Metaphysics.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Ryan Wasserman, David Manley, and David J. Chalmers, 260-289. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  Inwagen, Peter van. “When Are Objects Parts?.” Philosophical Perspectives 1 (1987): 21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214142

  Inwagen, Peter van. “Being, Existence, and Ontological Commitment.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Ryan Wasserman, David Manley, and David J. Chalmers. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  Justus, James. “Carnap on Concept Determination: Methodology for Philosophy of Science.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2, no. 2 (May 2012): 161–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-011-0027-5.

  Kant, Immanuel, Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Critique of Pure Reason. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

  Ladyman, James, Don Ross, David Spurrett, and John G. Collier. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

  Laudan, Larry. Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

  Laudan, Larry. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48, no. 1 (March 1981): 19–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/288975.

  Leśniewski, Stanisław, “Podstawy ogólnej teoryi mnogości I.” Prace Polskiego Koła Naukowego w Moskwie 2 (1916): 173-208.

  Lewis, David K. “Symposium: Chance and Credence: Humean Supervenience Debugged.” Mind 103, no. 412 (1994): 473–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/103.412.473.

  Lewis, David K. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.

  Lowe, E. J. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Substance, Identity, and Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.

  Machery, Edouard. Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.

  Mark, Colyvan. “Indispensability Arguments in the Philosophy of Mathematics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2024. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/mathphil-indis/.

  Maudlin, Tim. The Metaphysics Within Physics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199218219.001.0001.

  Morganti, Matteo. Combining Science and Metaphysics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002693.

  Morganti, Matteo. Metaphysics and the Sciences. Elements in Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.

  Morganti, Matteo, and Tuomas E. Tahko. “Moderately Naturalistic Metaphysics.” Synthese 194, no. 7 (July 2017): 2557–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1068-2.

  Paul, L. A. “Metaphysics as Modeling: The Handmaiden’s Tale.” Philosophical Studies 160, no. 1 (August 2012): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9906-7.

  Pigliucci, Massimo. “Science Needs Philosophy.” The Australian Humanist 108, no. 108 (2012): 16.

  Price, Huw. “Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?.” In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, edited by Ryan Wasserman, David Manley, and David J. Chalmers, 320-46. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

  Putnam, Hilary. Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Boston: Routledge, 1978.

  Quine, W. V. From a Logical Point of View: 9 Logico-Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953.

  Quine, W. V. “Grammar, Truth, and Logic.” In Philosophy and Grammar, edited by Stig Kanger and Sven Ōhman, 17–28. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9012-8_2.

  Quine, W. V. “On Carnap’s Views on Ontology.” Philosophical Studies 2, no. 5 (October 1951): 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199422.

  Quine, W. V. “On What There Is.” The Review of Metaphysics 2, no. 5 (1948): 21–38.

  Reichenbach, Hans. The Rise of Scientific Philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.

  Rosen, Gideon. “Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.” In Modality, edited by Bob Hale and Aviv Hoffmann, 109–36. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565818.003.0007.

  Rovelli, Carlo. “Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics.” Foundations of Physics 48, no. 5 (May 2018): 481–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0167-y.

  Schaffer, Jonathan. “On What Grounds What.” In Metametaphysics, edited by David J. Chalmers, David Manley, and Ryan Wasserman, 347–83. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0012.

  Sellars, Wilfrid. “Philosophy and the Scientific Image Of Man.” In Science, Perception and Reality, edited by Wilfrid Sellars, 1-40. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963.

  Sider, Theodore. Writing the Book of the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.

  Torrengo, Giuliano. Temporal Experience: The Atomist Dynamic Model. Oxford Studies of Time in Language and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780191937804.001.0001.

  Uzan, Jean-Philippe and Bénédicte Leclercq, De l’importance d’être une constante, Malakoff : Dunod, 2005.

  Van Fraassen, Bas C. The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300127966.

  Van Inwagen, Peter. “When Are Objects Parts?” Philosophical Perspectives 1 (1987): 21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214142.

  Waechter, Jonas, and James Ladyman. “In Defence of Ordinary Objects and a Naturalistic Answer to the Special Composition Question.” In The Nature of Ordinary Objects, edited by Javier Cumpa and Bill Brewer, 82–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316612897.006.

  Williamson, Timothy. “Model‐Building in Philosophy.” In Philosophy’s Future, edited by Russell Blackford and Damien Broderick, 159–71. Oxford: Wiley, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119210115.ch12.

  Wilson, Jessica M. “Three Dogmas of Metaphysical Methodology.” In Philosophical Methodology: The Armchair or the Laboratory?, edited by Matthew C. Haug, 145–65. New York: Routledge, 2013.

  Wittgenstein, Ludwig, C. Grant Luckhardt, and Maximilian Aue. The Big Typescript: TS 213. German-English scholar’s edition. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.

  Wolf, William J., James Read, and Quentin Vigneron. “The Non-Relativistic Geometric Trinity of Gravity.” General Relativity and Gravitation 56, no. 126 (2024).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03308-7.