Avelar, Juanito. “De verbo funcional a verbo substantivo: uma hipótese para a supressão de haver no português brasileiro.” Letras de Hoje 41 no. 1 (2006): 49-74.
Avelar, Juanito and Charlotte Galves. “O papel das línguas africanas na emergência da gramática do português brasileiro.” Lingüística 30 no.2 (online, [2013] 2014): 241-288. ISSN 2079-312X
Baldi, Philip and Andrea Nuti, “Possession.” New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, edited by Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 239-287. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010.
Bassols de Climent, Mariano. Sintaxis Historica de la lengua latina II. Madrid: CSIC, 1956.
Bauer, Brigitte. Du latin au français: Le passage d’une langue SOV à une langue SVO. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen, 1992.
Bauer, Brigitte. “Impersonal HABET constructions: At the cross-roads of Indo-European innovation.” In Language change and typological variation II, edited by Edgar C. Polomé and Carole F. Justus, 590-612. Washington: Institute for the study of man, 1999.
Bazenga, Aline. “A variação entre ter e haver em construções existenciais numa variedade insular do PE (Funchal).” In Estudos linguísticos e filológicos oferecidos a Ivo Castro, organized by Ernestina Carrilho, Ana Maria Martins, Sandra Pereira and João Paulo Silvestre, 181-216. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, 2019a.
Bazenga, Aline. “Aspetos da sintaxe do português falado no Funchal.” In Arquivo Histórico da Madeira, 727: 758. Funchal: Direção Regional do Arquivo e da Biblioteca da Madeira, 2019b.
Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Haver e ter em português medieval.” Revue de Linguistique Romane 70 (2006): 95-122.
Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Sobre o futuro – formas e construções marcadoras de posterioridade em textos portugueses dos se’culos XIII a XV.” In Ao sabor do texto – Estudos dedicados a Ivo Castro, edited by Rosario Alvaréz, Ana Maria Martins, Henrique Monteagudo and Mariana Ana Ramos, 77-90. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2013.
Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Usos epistémicos de ‘haver’ e ‘ter’ em português antigo.” Revue de Linguistique Romane 82 (2018): 353-376. https://unl.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/beafd9c2-0914-4a17-a4d7-baa71636dc1b.
Brugmann, Claudia. The Syntax and Semantics of HAVE and Its Complements. Berkeley: University of California, 1988.
Callou, Dinah and Juanito Avelar. “Sobre ter e haver em construções existenciais: variação e mudança no português do Brasil.” Gragoata’ 9 (2000): 85-100.
Cassimo, Saide. “Construções Sintácticas do Verbo Haver no Português Falado em Moçambique.” (2019) Consultado em 12. 7. 2023 em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/643824466/CASSIMO-S-2019-Construcoes-Sintacticas-Do-Verbo-Haver-No-Portugues-Falado-Em-Mocambique
Carrilho, Ernestina and Susana Pereira. “Sobre a distribuição geogra’fica de construções sinta’cticas não- padrão em português europeu.” In XXVI Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Lingui’stica (Anais), 125-139. Lisboa: APL, 2011.
Carvalho, Maria José. “Aspetos socio-cognitivos da variação e da mudança semântica: haver e ter em estruturas de posse.” Diacri’tica 28 no.1 (2014): 347-375.
Costa, Maria João. “Os verbos ‘aver’ e ‘teer’ no português arcaico – breve sinopse.” Filologia e Lingui’stica Portuguesa 12 no.1 (2010): 59-68. DOI https:// doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v21i1p7-8.
Croft, William. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Croft, William. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
De Smet, Hendryk, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn and Kristel Van Goethem. “The changing functions of competing forms.” Cognitive Linguistics 29 no. 2 (2018): 197-234. DOI:10.1515/cog-2016-0025
Diessel, Holger. The Constructicon: Taxonomies and Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327848
Fillmore, Charles. “Frame Semantics.” Linguistics in the Morning Calm – Selected Papers from SICOL 1981 (1982): 20-32.
Fleischman, Suzanne. The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
Fruyt, Michèle. “Grammaticalization in Latin.” In Towards a New Syntax of Latin, edited by Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 661-684. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter 2009. 661-864. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253412.661
Geeraerts, Dirk and Yves Peirsman. “Zones, facets and prototype-based metonomies.” In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: towards a consensus view, edited by Benczes, Réka, António Barcelona and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 89-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
Goldberg, Adele. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.
Goldberg, Adele. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
Heine, Bernd. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1997a.
Heine, Bernd. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997b.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott, Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik and Achim Zeileis. “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical statistics 15 no. 3 (2006): 651-674.
Houaiss, Antonio, Mauro de Salles Villar, Francisco Manoel de Mello Franco. Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2001.
Koch, Peter. “Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: the semantic space HAVE/BE.” In Historical Semantics and Cognition, edited by Andreas Blank and Peter Koch, 279-305. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.
Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1:Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
Langacker, Ronald W. “Reference-Point Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 4 (1993): 1-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
Langacker, Ronald W. “Raising and Transparency.” Language 71 no.1 (1995): 57-58.
Langacker, Ronald W. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.
Langacker, Ronald W. “Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses.” In Language, Culture and Mind, edited by Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, 535-577. Stanford: CSLI Publications 2004a.
Langacker, Ronald W. “Possession, location and existence.” In Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva I, edited by Soares da Silva, Augusto, Amadeu Torres and Miguel Gonçalves, 85–120. Coimbra: Almedina, 2004b.
Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
Langacker, Ronald W. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009.
Lehmann, Christian. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2015.
Mattos e Silva, Rosa Virgínia. “Vito’rias de ter sobre haver nos meados do se’culo XVI: usos e teorias em João de Barros.” In O Português Quinhentista, organized by Rosa Virgi’nia Mattos e Silva and Ame’rico Venâncio Lopes Machado Filho, 121-142. Salvador: EDUFBA/UEFS, 2002a.
Meillet, Auguste. “L’évolution des formes grammaticales.” Scientia 12: 130-148.
Park, Chongwon and Bridget Park. “Cognitive Grammar and English nominalization: event/result nominals and gerundives.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 no.4 (2017): 711-756.
Pinkster, Harm. “The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin.” In Historical development of auxiliaries, edited by Martin Harris and Paolo Ramat, 193-223. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.193
Pinkster, Harm. Sintaxis y Semántica del Latín, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 1995.
São Jerónimo. “Epistola CXXIII.” Delphi Collected Works of Jerome. Delphi Classics, Edição para e-pub, 2022.
Sampaio, Maria Lúcia P. Estudo diacrônico dos verbos TER e AVER, duas formas em concorrência. São Paulo: Assis, 1978. Consultado em 10.11.2017 em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/159053795/ Estudo-Diacronico-Dos-Verbos-TER-e-HAVER-.
Silva de F. Araujo, Silvana and Nathalia dos Santos Dantas. “Os verbos ter e haver existenciais no português falado em Luanda-Angola.” Letrônica 10 no. 1 (2017): 64-81. DOI https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.1.24809
Stassen, Leon. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley and Gerhard Tutz. “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests.” Psychological Methods 14 no. 4 (2009): 323-348.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Harald Baayen. “Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language Variation and Change 24 no. 2 (2012): 135-178. DOI:10.1017/S0954394512000129
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher, Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Graeme Trousdale. “Grammatical Constructionalization.” In Constructionalization and Constructional Changes, edited by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Graeme Trousdale, 94-148. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Vangaever, Jasper and Mihaela Ilioaia. “Specialisation through competition: HABEO vs MIHI EST from Latin to Romanian.” In Quand le syntagme nominal prend ses marques: du pre’dicat à l’argument, edited by Peter Lauwers, Katia Paykin, Mihaela Ilioaia, Machteld Meulleman and Pascale Hadermann, 243-265. Reims: EPURE, 2021.
Viotti, Evani. “Uma história sobre TER e HAVER.” Cadernos de Estudos Lingüisticos 34 (1998): 41-50.
Viotti, Evani. “Sobre o efeito de definitude nas sentenças existenciais.” Revista Do GEL (2002): 127-153.