Categorias

Apostolado da Oração

Pesquisa

A conceptualização da posse e da existência em português

A conceptualização da posse e da existência em português

Joana Jacinto, “A conceptualização da posse e da existência em português: subsídios para a conceptualização dos desenvolvimentos diacrónicos das construções com haver e ter,” Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades 28, no. 1–2 (2024): 111–42, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPH/2024_28_1_111.

Mais detalhes

À venda À venda!
10,00 €

222810111

Disponível apenas on-line

  • A conceptualização da posse e da existência em português: subsídios para a conceptualização dos desenvolvimentos diacrónicos das construções com haver e ter

    Item Type Journal Article
    Author Joana Jacinto
    Abstract This paper develops an analysis of the historical development of the possessive and existential constructions in Portuguese from a Cognitive Grammar perspective, as the outcome of a metonymical mapping which has taken place in the conceptual space shared by possessive, locative and existential constructions. Moreover, we demonstrate that the shift from possession to existence can be ascribed to two different types of construals: 1) reification in the possessive domain and 2) active-zone activation in the existential domain. Thus we claim that possessive constructions with haver correspond to a relationship profiled by a verb that takes an internal perspective and propose that the existential construction arises from a change in the primary focal prominence of the elements in such relationship, i.e., through zone-activation or metonymic shift of the already reified verbal basis.
    Date 2024
    Language Portuguese
    Rights © 2024 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural
    Extra The Conceptualization of Possession and Existence in Portuguese: Contributions to the Study of the Diachronic Developments of Constructions with Haver and Ter
    Volume 28
    Pages 111-142
    Publication Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades
    DOI 10.17990/RPH/2024_28_1_111
    Issue 1-2
    ISSN 0874-0321
    Date Added 12/30/2024, 6:46:41 PM
    Modified 12/30/2024, 7:00:44 PM

    Tags:

    • existence, haver, metonymy, possession, portuguese, ter.

    Notes:

    • Avelar, Juanito. “De verbo funcional a verbo substantivo: uma hipótese para a supressão de haver no português brasileiro.” Letras de Hoje 41 no. 1 (2006): 49-74.

      Avelar, Juanito and Charlotte Galves. “O papel das línguas africanas na emergência da gramática do português brasileiro.” Lingüística 30 no.2 (online, [2013] 2014): 241-288. ISSN 2079-312X

      Baldi, Philip and Andrea Nuti, “Possession.” New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, edited by Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 239-287. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2010.

      Bassols de Climent, Mariano. Sintaxis Historica de la lengua latina II. Madrid: CSIC, 1956.

      Bauer, Brigitte. Du latin au français: Le passage d’une langue SOV à une langue SVO. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen, 1992.

      Bauer, Brigitte. “Impersonal HABET constructions: At the cross-roads of Indo-European innovation.” In Language change and typological variation II, edited by Edgar C. Polomé and Carole F. Justus, 590-612. Washington: Institute for the study of man, 1999.

      Bazenga, Aline. “A variação entre ter e haver em construções existenciais numa variedade insular do PE (Funchal).” In Estudos linguísticos e filológicos oferecidos a Ivo Castro, organized by Ernestina Carrilho, Ana Maria Martins, Sandra Pereira and João Paulo Silvestre, 181-216. Lisboa: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, 2019a.

      Bazenga, Aline. “Aspetos da sintaxe do português falado no Funchal.” In Arquivo Histórico da Madeira, 727: 758. Funchal: Direção Regional do Arquivo e da Biblioteca da Madeira, 2019b.

      Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Haver e ter em português medieval.” Revue de Linguistique Romane 70 (2006): 95-122.

      Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Sobre o futuro – formas e construções marcadoras de posterioridade em textos portugueses dos se’culos XIII a XV.” In Ao sabor do texto – Estudos dedicados a Ivo Castro, edited by Rosario Alvaréz, Ana Maria Martins, Henrique Monteagudo and Mariana Ana Ramos, 77-90. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 2013.

      Brocardo, Maria Teresa. “Usos epistémicos de ‘haver’ e ‘ter’ em português antigo.” Revue de Linguistique Romane 82 (2018): 353-376. https://unl.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/beafd9c2-0914-4a17-a4d7-baa71636dc1b.

      Brugmann, Claudia. The Syntax and Semantics of HAVE and Its Complements. Berkeley: University of California, 1988.

      Callou, Dinah and Juanito Avelar. “Sobre ter e haver em construções existenciais: variação e mudança no português do Brasil.” Gragoata’ 9 (2000): 85-100.

      Cassimo, Saide. “Construções Sintácticas do Verbo Haver no Português Falado em Moçambique.” (2019) Consultado em 12. 7. 2023 em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/643824466/CASSIMO-S-2019-Construcoes-Sintacticas-Do-Verbo-Haver-No-Portugues-Falado-Em-Mocambique

      Carrilho, Ernestina and Susana Pereira. “Sobre a distribuição geogra’fica de construções sinta’cticas não- padrão em português europeu.” In XXVI Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Lingui’stica (Anais), 125-139. Lisboa: APL, 2011.

      Carvalho, Maria José. “Aspetos socio-cognitivos da variação e da mudança semântica: haver e ter em estruturas de posse.” Diacri’tica 28 no.1 (2014): 347-375.

      Costa, Maria João. “Os verbos ‘aver’ e ‘teer’ no português arcaico – breve sinopse.” Filologia e Lingui’stica Portuguesa 12 no.1 (2010): 59-68. DOI https:// doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v21i1p7-8.

      Croft, William. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

      Croft, William. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001

      De Smet, Hendryk, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn and Kristel Van Goethem. “The changing functions of competing forms.” Cognitive Linguistics 29 no. 2 (2018): 197-234. DOI:10.1515/cog-2016-0025

      Diessel, Holger. The Constructicon: Taxonomies and Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009327848

      Fillmore, Charles. “Frame Semantics.” Linguistics in the Morning Calm – Selected Papers from SICOL 1981 (1982): 20-32.

      Fleischman, Suzanne. The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

      Fruyt, Michèle. “Grammaticalization in Latin.” In Towards a New Syntax of Latin, edited by Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, 661-684. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter 2009. 661-864. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110253412.661

      Geeraerts, Dirk and Yves Peirsman. “Zones, facets and prototype-based metonomies.” In Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: towards a consensus view, edited by Benczes, Réka, António Barcelona and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, 89-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.

      Goldberg, Adele. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995.

      Goldberg, Adele. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001

      Heine, Bernd. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1997a.

      Heine, Bernd. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997b.

      Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott, Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

      Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik and Achim Zeileis. “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical statistics 15 no. 3 (2006): 651-674.

      Houaiss, Antonio, Mauro de Salles Villar, Francisco Manoel de Mello Franco. Dicionário Houaiss da Língua Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2001.

      Koch, Peter. “Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: the semantic space HAVE/BE.” In Historical Semantics and Cognition, edited by Andreas Blank and Peter Koch, 279-305. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.

      Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980.

      Langacker, Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1:Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.

      Langacker, Ronald W. “Reference-Point Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 4 (1993): 1-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1

      Langacker, Ronald W. “Raising and Transparency.” Language 71 no.1 (1995): 57-58.

      Langacker, Ronald W. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2003.

      Langacker, Ronald W. “Aspects of the grammar of finite clauses.” In Language, Culture and Mind, edited by Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, 535-577. Stanford: CSLI Publications 2004a.

      Langacker, Ronald W. “Possession, location and existence.” In Linguagem, cultura e cognição: Estudos de Linguística Cognitiva I, edited by Soares da Silva, Augusto, Amadeu Torres and Miguel Gonçalves, 85–120. Coimbra: Almedina, 2004b.

      Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.

      Langacker, Ronald W. Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2009.

      Lehmann, Christian. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2015.

      Mattos e Silva, Rosa Virgínia. “Vito’rias de ter sobre haver nos meados do se’culo XVI: usos e teorias em João de Barros.” In O Português Quinhentista, organized by Rosa Virgi’nia Mattos e Silva and Ame’rico Venâncio Lopes Machado Filho, 121-142. Salvador: EDUFBA/UEFS, 2002a.

      Meillet, Auguste. “L’évolution des formes grammaticales.” Scientia 12: 130-148.

      Park, Chongwon and Bridget Park. “Cognitive Grammar and English nominalization: event/result nominals and gerundives.” Cognitive Linguistics 28 no.4 (2017): 711-756.

      Pinkster, Harm. “The strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin.” In Historical development of auxiliaries, edited by Martin Harris and Paolo Ramat, 193-223. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110856910.193

      Pinkster, Harm. Sintaxis y Semántica del Latín, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 1995.

      São Jerónimo. “Epistola CXXIII.” Delphi Collected Works of Jerome. Delphi Classics, Edição para e-pub, 2022.

      Sampaio, Maria Lúcia P. Estudo diacrônico dos verbos TER e AVER, duas formas em concorrência. São Paulo: Assis, 1978. Consultado em 10.11.2017 em: https://pt.scribd.com/document/159053795/ Estudo-Diacronico-Dos-Verbos-TER-e-HAVER-.

      Silva de F. Araujo, Silvana and Nathalia dos Santos Dantas. “Os verbos ter e haver existenciais no português falado em Luanda-Angola.” Letrônica 10 no. 1 (2017): 64-81. DOI https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.1.24809

      Stassen, Leon. Predicative Possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.

      Strobl, Carolin, James Malley and Gerhard Tutz. “An Introduction to Recursive Partitioning: Rationale, Application, and Characteristics of Classification and Regression Trees, Bagging, and Random Forests.” Psychological Methods 14 no. 4 (2009): 323-348.

      Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Harald Baayen. “Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice.” Language Variation and Change 24 no. 2 (2012): 135-178. DOI:10.1017/S0954394512000129

      Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher, Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

      Traugott, Elizabeth C.  and Graeme Trousdale. “Grammatical Constructionalization.” In Constructionalization and Constructional Changes, edited by Elizabeth C. Traugott and Graeme Trousdale, 94-148. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

      Vangaever, Jasper and Mihaela Ilioaia. “Specialisation through competition: HABEO vs MIHI EST from Latin to Romanian.” In Quand le syntagme nominal prend ses marques: du pre’dicat à l’argument, edited by Peter Lauwers, Katia Paykin, Mihaela Ilioaia, Machteld Meulleman and Pascale Hadermann, 243-265. Reims: EPURE, 2021.

      Viotti, Evani. “Uma história sobre TER e HAVER.” Cadernos de Estudos Lingüisticos 34 (1998): 41-50.

      Viotti, Evani. “Sobre o efeito de definitude nas sentenças existenciais.” Revista Do GEL (2002): 127-153.

Carrinho  

Sem produtos

Envio 0,00 €
Total 0,00 €

Carrinho Encomendar

PayPal

Pesquisa