Virtue Ethics and the Concept of Action
Ramon Das, “Virtue Ethics and the Concept of Action,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76, no. 1 (2020): 61–74, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0061.
Ramon Das, “Virtue Ethics and the Concept of Action,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 76, no. 1 (2020): 61–74, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0061.
| Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Ramon Das |
| Rights | © 2020 Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-74 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 |
| Date | 2020 |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2020_76_1_0061 |
| Language | English |
| Abstract | This paper explores some parallels between the concept of action as it is deployed in two theoretical projects: constructing a virtue-ethical account of right action; and explaining human actions in (event) causal terms. Although one project is normative and the other non-normative, I argue that they face essentially the same fundamental challenge: both have a difficult time dealing with the familiar fact that persons have the ability to act out of character. For virtue ethics, this fact threatens to undermine its most distinctive account of what makes an action right, one that grounds rightness in virtuous character. For causal theories of action, it makes trouble for the idea that all human actions can be explained adequately within an event-causal framework. |
| Date Added | 4/30/2020, 12:02:45 AM |
| Modified | 4/30/2020, 11:34:06 AM |
Annas, Julia. Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2011).
Dancy, Jonathan. Practical Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2000).
Das, Ramon. “Virtue Ethics and Right Action.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2003): 324-49.
Das, Ramon. “Virtue Ethics and Right Action: A Critique.” In The Routledge Companion to Virtue Ethics, edited by Lorraine Besser-Jones and Michael Slote. New York: Routledge (2015), pp. 331-45.
Das, Ramon. “Virtue, Reason, and Will.” In Virtue’s Reasons: New Essays on Virtue, Character, and Reasons. Edited by Noell Birondo and S. Stewart Braun. New York: Routledge (2017), pp. 91-106.
Davidson, Donald. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1980).
Ginet, Carl. On Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990).
Hursthouse, Rosalind. “Are Virtues the Proper Starting Point for Morality?” In Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory, edited by James Dreier. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing (2006), pp. 99-112.
Kawall, J. “In Defence of the Primacy of the Virtues.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (2009): 1-21.
Lowe, E.J. Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2008).
Marcus, Eric. Rational Causation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2012).
McCann, H.J. The Works of Agency: on Human Action, Will, and Freedom. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press (2008).
McDowell, John. “Virtue and Reason.” The Monist 62 (1979): 331-50.
Mele, Alfred J. Aspects of Agency: Decisions, Abilities, Explanations, and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2017).
O’Connor, Timothy. Persons as Causes: The Metaphysics of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2000).
Russell, Daniel C. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2009).
Steward, Helen. “Actions as Processes.” Philosophical Perspectives 26 (2012): 373-88.
Tiberius, Valerie. “How to Think About Virtue and Right.” Philosophical Papers 35 (2006): 247-65.
Velleman, J. David. “What Happens When Someone Acts?” Mind 101, Vol. 403 (1992): 461-81.