Three Interpretations of Habermas’s Theory of Truth
Piet Strydom, “Three Interpretations of Habermas’s Theory of Truth,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 79, no. 3 (2023): 1175–90, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2023_79_3_1175.
Piet Strydom, “Three Interpretations of Habermas’s Theory of Truth,” Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 79, no. 3 (2023): 1175–90, https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2023_79_3_1175.
| Item Type | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Author | Piet Strydom |
| Abstract | These reflections are devoted to a critical comparison of three distinct interpretations of Habermas’s theory of truth. The first, which is presented as the more adequate interpretation, takes Habermas’s theory as having a three-moment structure, whereas the two remaining interpretations are both based on his two-moment conception of “Janus-faced truth”. Whereas Steven Levine stresses the nonepistemic lifeworld pole of the two-sided concept and Alex Seemann the opposite epistemic discursive pole, the three-moment interpretation counters with a synthetic conception which emphasises the role of the context-transcendent universalistic concept of truth. This overarching interpretation is inspired by a cognitive perspective concerned with the full circle of the sociocultural embodiment and realisation of reason. |
| Date | 2023 |
| Language | English |
| Rights | © 2023 Aletheia - Associação Científica e Cultural |
| Volume | 79 |
| Pages | 1175-1190 |
| Publication | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| DOI | 10.17990/RPF/2023_79_3_1175 |
| Issue | 3 |
| ISSN | 0870-5283 ; 2183-461X |
| Date Added | 11/1/2023, 1:42:31 AM |
| Modified | 11/1/2023, 2:02:08 AM |
Habermas, Jürgen. “What is Universal Pragmatics?” In Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas and translated by Thomas McCarthy, 1-68. London: Heinemann, 1979.
Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
Habermas, Jürgen. Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1999.
Habermas, Jürgen. “Richard Rorty’s Pragmatic Turn”. In On the Pragmatics of Communication, by Jürgen Habermas, translated and edited by Maeve Cooke, 343-382. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.
Habermas, Jürgen. Truth and Justification. Translated by Barbara Fultner. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003.
Levine, Steven. “Habermas, Kantian Pragmatism, and Truth”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36, no. 6 (2010): 677-95. Doi.org/10.1177/0191453710366216.
Mithen, Steven. The Prehistory of the Mind. London: Phoenix, 1998.
Seemann, Alex. “Lifeworld, Discourse, and Realism: On Habermas’s Theory of Truth”. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30, no. 4 (2004): 503-14. Doi.org/10.1177/0191453704044041.
Sperber, Dan. “Metarepresentation in Evolutionary Perspective”. In Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. Dan Sperber, 117-137. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Stringer, Chris. The Origin of Our Species. London: Penguin, 2012.
Strydom, Piet. “On the Cognitive Order of Society: Radicalising the Ontological Turn in Critical Theory”. Unpublished manuscript (2013). URL https://www.academia.edu/5552407/.
Strydom, Piet. “The Problem of Limit Concepts in Habermas: Toward a Cognitive Approach to the Cultural Embodiment of Reason”. Philosophical Inquiry 42, no. 1-2 (2018): 168-189. [No DOI available].
Strydom, Piet. “Critical Theory and Cognitive Sociology”. In Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology, eds. Wayne H. Brekhus and Gabe Ignatow, 42-64. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Strydom, Piet. “On Habermas’s Differentiation of Rightness from Truth: Can an Achievement Concept Do without a Validity Concept? Philosophy and Social Criticism 45, no. 5 (2019). 555-74. Doi.org/10.1177/0191453718816346.
Strydom, Piet. “The Critical Theory of Society: From its Young-Hegelian Core to its Key Concept of Possibility”. European Journal of Social Theory 26, no. 2 (2023): 153-179. Doi.org/10.1177/13684310221130914.
Wilson, Edward O. The Social Conquest of Earth. New York and London: Liveright, 2012.
Wynn, Thomas and Frederick Coolidge. “The Implications of the Working Memory Model for the Evolution of Modern Cognition”. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology (2011). Doi.org/10.4061/2011/741357.