Armstrong, David Malet. A theory of universals. Universals and scientific realism volume II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Repeated Author. Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Balaguer, Mark. Platonism in metaphysics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), edited by Edward N ZaltaStanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, 2016.
Campbell, Keith. Abstract particulars. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
Carmichael, Chad. “Deep platonism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92, no. 2 (2016): 307-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12190.
Crane, Tim. The objects of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Diekemper, Joseph. “The ontology of thisness”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 90, no. 1 (2015): 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12010.
Earman, John. “The implications of general covariance for the ontology and ideology of spacetime”. Philosophy and Foundations of Physics 1, (2006): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1871-1774(06)01001-1.
Effingham, Nikk. “The location of properties”. Noûs 49, no. 4 (2015): 846-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12093.
Fine, Kit. “Essence and modality: The second philosophical perspectives lecture”. Philosophical perspectives 8, (1994): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214160.
Hall, Edward J. David lewis’s metaphysics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N ZaltaStanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, 2016.
Han, Xiao Qiang. “Why can’t we dispense with the subject-predicate form without losing something more?”. Florida Philosophical Review 9, no. 2 (2009): 79-89.
Heil, John. From an ontological point of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Repeated Author. The universe as we find it. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Hoffman, Joshua, and Gary S Rosenkrantz. Substance among other categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Ingram, David. Thisness presentism: An essay on time, Truth, and ontology. Oxford: Routledge, 2018.
Keller, Simon. Presentism and truthmaking. In Oxford studies in metaphysics, edited by Dean W Zimmerman, 83-104. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Kim, Jaegwon. Supervenience and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Lowe, E Jonathan. A survey of metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford, 2002.
Repeated Author. The four-category ontology: A metaphysical foundation for natural science. New York: Clarendon Press, 2005.
Repeated Author. “Two notions of being: Entity and essence”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 62, (2008): 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246108000568.
Lowe, E. Jonathan. There are (probably) no relations. In The Metaphysics of Relations, edited by Anna Marmadoro, and David Yates, 100-12. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
MacBride, Fraser. Relations, edited by Edward N Zalta: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2020.
Magidor, Ofra. Category mistakes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Merricks, Trenton. Objects and persons. New York: Clarendon Press, 2001.
O’Leary-Hawthorne, John. “The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indiscernibles”. Analysis 55, no. 3 (1995): 191-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3328579.
Paul, Laurie A. “Logical parts”. Noûs 36, no. 4 (2002): 578-96.
Repeated Author. “II—L. A. Paul: Categorical priority and categorical collapse”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 87, no. 1 (2013): 89-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2013.00221.x.
Pini, Giorgio. “Scotus’s realist conception of the categories: His legacy to late medieval debates”. Vivarium 43, no. 1 (2005): 63-110. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568534054068410.
Rosen, Gideon. Abstract objects. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy edited by Edward N ZaltaStanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab, 2018.
Rosenkrantz, Gary S. Haecceity: An ontological essay. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
Rovelli, Carlo. “Shan Gao: The meaning of the wave function. In search of the ontology of quantum mechanics”. Foundations of Physics 48, no. 6 (2018): 747-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0159-y.
Sainsbury, Mark. Reference without referents. New York: Clarendon Press, 2005.
Schaffer, Jonathan. “The individuation of tropes”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79, no. 2 (2001): 247-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/713659225.
Shen, Jia Xuan. “Problems caused by modelling Chinese grammar on subject and predicate”. Journal of Foreign Languages 41, no. 6 (2018): 2-15. https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2019.027000.
Simons, Peter. I—Relations and truthmaking. Paper read at Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2010.00192.x.
Smith, Barry. “On substances, accidents and universals: In defence of a constituent ontology”. Philosophical Papers 26, no. 1 (1997): 105-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568649709506558.
Squires, David Philip. A defense of aristotle’s constituent ontology. South Bend, Indiana, US: University of Notre Dame, 2017.
Thomasson, Amie L. Ontology made easy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Yang, Eric. “Defending constituent ontology”. Philosophical Studies 175, (2018): 1207-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0903-8.
Zhang, Ruoyu. “Haecceity mereology”. Metaphysica 23, no. 2 (2022): 275-94. https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2021-0034.’